Laserfiche WebLink
SECTiON®NE <br /> The preliminary site assessment phase includes irntial site investigation, initial abatement actions, initial <br /> site charactenzation and any interim remedial action (Cal Code of Regs Title 23 § 2723, subd (a)) <br /> Corrective action is complete at the conclusion of the preliminary site assessment phase, unless <br /> conditions warrant a soil and water investigation A soil and water investigation is required if any of <br /> the following conditions exists (1) There is evidence that surface water or groundwater has been or <br /> may be affected by the unauthorized release, (2) Free product is found at the site where the <br /> unauthorized release occurred or in the surrounding area, (3) There is evidence that contaminated soils <br /> are or may be in contact with surface water or ground water, or(4)The regulatory agency requests an <br /> investigation, based on the actual or potential effects of contaminated soil or groundwater on nearby <br /> surface water or groundwater resources or based on the increased risk of fire or explosion (Cal Code <br /> Regs, Title 23, §2724) <br /> The purpose of a soil and water investigation is "to assess the nature and vertical and lateral extent of <br /> the unauthorized release and to determine a cost-effective method of cleanup " (Cal Code of Regs, <br /> Title 23, §2725, subd (a)) <br /> SWRCB Resolution 92-49, Policies and Procedures for Investigation and Cleanup and Abatement of <br /> Discharges Under Water Code Section 13304, also applies to petroleum UST cases Resolution 92- <br /> 49 directs the RWQCBs to ensure that water affected by an unauthorized release attains either back ' <br /> ground water quality or the best water quality which is reasonable if background water quality cannot <br /> be restored (SWRCB Resolution 92-49, M G) Any alternative level of water quality less stringent than <br /> background must be consistent with the maximum benefit to the people of the state, not unreasonably <br /> affect current and probable future beneficial use of affected water, and not result in water quality less <br /> than that prescribed in the water quality control plan for the basin within which the site is located <br /> (hereafter basun plan) <br /> Resolution 9249 does not require, however, that the requisite level of water quality be met at the time <br /> of site closure Even if the requisite level of water quality has not yet been attained, a site may be <br /> closed if the level will be attained within a reasonable period(SWRCB Resolution 92-49, III A) <br /> The Fourth Edition of the Water Quality Control Plan(Basin Plan) for the Sacramento River and San <br /> Joaquin River Basins dated September 1, 1998 designates existing and potential beneficial uses of <br /> groundwater in the San Joaquin River Basin as municipal and domestic (ARUM supply, industrial <br /> service supply, agricultural supply, and industrial process supply(located on page II-3 00) <br /> In making any exception to the beneficial use designation of municipal and domestic supply <br /> (MUN), the Regional Water Board will apply the criteria in State Water Board Resolution No <br /> 88-63, 'Sources of Drinking Water Policy' The criteria for exceptions are <br /> WO*dw=dl4Wa ® T1/687W3008NA1STOCKTOMREPORTalOREP#1 DOC%+ME 99MMOOMMSNA 1-2 <br />