My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012547
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
B
>
1603
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0543430
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012547
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2019 11:02:05 AM
Creation date
2/5/2019 10:46:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012547
RECORD_ID
PR0543430
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0009377
FACILITY_NAME
CAL TRANS MAINT SHOP 10
STREET_NUMBER
1603
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
B
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16918002
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1603 S B ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
307
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> Woodward•Clywe COnStti,tat"s <br /> 7.0 PREFERRED REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVE <br /> The criteria for seiecting an alternative to remediate hydrocarbon contamination at the <br /> Callrans Shop 10 facility include the cost and time required to achieve required cleanup <br /> levels, the applicability of the selected technology, and the likelihood of regulatory <br /> approval. A ccsi comparison indicates that groundwater extraction with on-site air <br /> stnaping treatment and discharge to the sanitary sewer in combination with VES <br /> treatment of soils is slightly more cost effective that enhanced insitu biodegradation. <br /> Thls analysis assumes that Caltrans can obtain air and sanitary sewer discharge permits <br /> that allow low concentrations of volatile compounds (such as ethylbenzene) into the <br /> atmosphere and POTW. if either permit cannot be obtained, then reinfiltration of the <br /> treated water into the contaminated soils with the addition of nutrients to enhance <br /> biodegredation may be the only remaining alternative. This technology is less cost <br /> r- -„Live than either of the alternatives described and also requires permits from the <br /> local health agency and RWQCS to reinject the treated water. <br /> 7 <br /> i <br /> i <br /> i <br /> a <br /> , <br /> 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.