My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012547
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
B
>
1603
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0543430
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012547
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2019 11:02:05 AM
Creation date
2/5/2019 10:46:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012547
RECORD_ID
PR0543430
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0009377
FACILITY_NAME
CAL TRANS MAINT SHOP 10
STREET_NUMBER
1603
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
B
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16918002
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1603 S B ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
307
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. '� 'L. _ .:rya x ' — •A Y,,y, a� <br /> r-Y i <br /> Memorandum <br /> SATE OF CALiFORN�A <br /> REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD o CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> 3443 Routier Raid Sacramento,Celifornia 9582? -3098 Phone: 916/361-5600 <br /> To: Regulatory Staff FROM: Gordon Le oggs <br /> Undergro Tank <br /> Progra oordinator <br /> DATE: 24 March 19$7 sl(3NATURE: <br /> SUBJECT: CONSULTANT REPORTS FOR ASSESSIN GROUND WATER <br /> PROBLEMS AT SITES UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKSN(LUSZ s)T D BY LEAKING <br /> In the course of our work we may review several proposals submitted by <br /> consultants on behalf of an underground tank owner to either initiate work to <br /> determine if a problem exists or, if one is found, the extent and appropriate <br /> remedial actions needed to alleviate the problem. Often we find that a report <br /> format has emitted essential information or the information has not been prepared <br /> in a manner that allows the ,ocal implementing agency (L1A) or us to review the <br /> proposal expeditiously. Such delays are neither cost effective for us or the tank <br /> owner. The problem is not necessarily one of the consultants' but a collective <br /> result of us all trying to accomplish a monumental task of permitting and cleaning t <br /> up sites in a constricted time schedule. Our process should be one which would <br /> help minimize downtime for the tank owner. <br /> To facilitate and streamline our operations for providing tank owners and their <br /> consultants with our requirements for determining the significance of a tank <br /> system leak, a consistent reporting procedure is indtcated. When ground water nas <br /> been shown to be contaminated as a result of a tank leak, it would seem that three <br /> {3 reports should be sufficient to describe the problem ano suggest r_medial <br /> actions that would mitigate or eliminate the problem: <br /> 1. A ft-diminary Ronpat to assess the site and problem with suggessted <br /> borenoles and monitor wells needed to determine site status; <br /> 2. A h e Aja,-ag hent. RP (rt to describe the lateral and vertical extent <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.