Laserfiche WebLink
2.1 Site Conceptual Exposure Model <br /> A Site Conceptual Exposure Model depicting the source of contamination and methods of transport is <br /> depicted on Figure 9. The only two potentially complete pathways to receptors are impacted <br /> groundwater to nearby water wells and inhalation of vapors to onsite and future onsite workers from <br /> the impacted subsurface soil and dissolved groundwater plume. Based on previous investigations for <br /> r adjacent facilities, two municipal water wells are located within the site vicinity. One well is located <br /> approximately 1,100 feet southwest (crossgradient) of the Site, and one well is located approximately <br /> r 575 feet northwest (upgradient) of the Site. Based on the distance of these wells and their locations <br /> relative to the Site, this pathway is considered generally incomplete. The inhalation pathway is further <br /> considered generally incomplete as the concrete slab floor of the gas house (the building located <br /> nearest to the groundwater plume) would minimize the vertical migration of vapors into the building, <br /> the building is occupied only over brief intervals, and any vapors migrating outside of the building <br /> would be expected to dissipate prior to reaching the workers' breathing zone. <br /> 3.0 ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATION <br /> r <br /> Based on the results of the additional site investigation and Third and Fourth Quarter—2008 groundwater <br /> monitoring results it appears that monitoring data for the deep-screened wells at the Site may not be <br /> r <br /> representative of current site conditions. We therefore recommend destruction of six of the nine deep- <br /> screened wells at the Site and installation of three downgradient and one upgradient shallow-screened <br /> i" wells. We propose to keep deep-screened monitoring wells MW-2, MW-10 and MW-11 in the event <br /> that groundwater levels drop below the screened intervals in the new wells; however, wells MW-2, <br /> MW-10 and MW-11 will not be part of the quarterly groundwater monitoring program. The proposed <br /> monitoring well locations are depicted on Figure 10. The following are general procedures to complete <br /> our recommend scope of services. <br /> r <br /> 3.1 Pre-field Activities <br /> • Utilize the existing project-specific health and safety plan (HSP) to provide guidelines on the use <br /> of personal protective equipment and the health and safety procedures to be implemented during <br /> the proposed field activities. <br /> y • Mark the proposed soil boring locations with white paint as required by law and provide a <br /> minimum of 48-hours notice to the local public utilities via Underground Service Alert(USA). We <br /> will also subcontract with a private utility locating service to further attempt to delineate <br /> y subsurface public utilities and conduits in proximity to the proposed boring locations. <br /> • Obtain permits and pay requisite fees to the SJCEHD for the hollow-stem auger (HSA) well <br /> installation and well destruction activities. <br /> • Retain the services of Gregg Drilling, a Caltrans-approved, C57-licensed drilling company to <br /> perform the well installation and well destruction activities. <br /> r <br /> r <br /> Project No.Stockton Yard,Task Order No.45 -4- Caltrans Contract 03A1368,EA No. 10-ON8300 <br /> Project No.S9300-06-45 January 28,2009 <br /> r <br />