My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000253
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
B
>
1604
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0543431
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000253
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2019 2:33:54 PM
Creation date
2/5/2019 1:23:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0000253
RECORD_ID
PR0543431
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003683
FACILITY_NAME
Caltrans-Stockton
STREET_NUMBER
1604
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
B
STREET_TYPE
St
City
Stockton
Zip
95206
APN
171-090-08
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1604 S B St
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
California Department of Transportation July 2, 2001 <br /> Stockton Maintenance Station, Stockton, California Project No 400296001 <br /> • <br /> 4.3. Laboratory Analysis <br /> The groundwater samples were submitted for analysis to AL, a State of California-certified <br /> hazardous waste analytical laboratory Samples were also analyzed for TPH-G and TPH-D, <br /> using EPA method 8015 (modified) Samples were analyzed for BTEX, methyl tertiary- <br /> butyl ether (MTBE), tertiary-amyl-methyl ether (TAME), isopropyl ether (DIPE), tertiary <br /> butyl (TBA), ethyl-tertiary-butyl ether (ETBE), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) <br /> using EPA method 8260B A summary of the past and present laboratory results for the <br /> groundwater samples is presented in Table 1 Copies of laboratory results and chain-of- <br /> custody documents are included in Appendix B <br /> 5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> Ninyo & Moore measured depth-to-groundwater and sampled fourteen wells at the site on March <br /> 20-21, 2001 Groundwater elevation data indicates that the groundwater flows to the southeast <br /> • beneath the site with a hydraulic gradient of 0 003 feet per foot Comparatively, groundwater <br /> levels taken during the last monitoring event in December indicate the same flow direction and a <br /> hydraulic gradient of 0 002 ft/ft Groundwater elevation has increased in all of the on-site wells <br /> since the last monitoring event Groundwater elevations have increased in monitoring wells <br /> MW-1 by 177 ft , MW-2 by 162 ft , MW-3 by 1 75 ft , MW-4 by 177 ft , MW-5 by 176 ft, <br /> MW-6 by 176 ft , MW-7 by 1 85 ft , MW-8 by 170 ft , MW-9 by 176 ft , MW-10 by 171 ft , <br /> MW-11 by 1 54 ft , MW-12 by 1 83 ft , VW-1 by 1 70 ft and VW-2 by 1 76 ft <br /> Laboratory analytical data has indicated changes in many of the compounds analyzed in samples <br /> taken from various wells on site since the December 2000 monitoring event <br /> In well MW-1, Benzene concentration decreased from 6 4 micrograms per liter (µg/l) to non- <br /> detectable Levels Total xylene concentration decreased from 21 µg/L to non-detectable levels <br /> In well MW-2, TPH-G concentration increased from 180 µg/1 to 200 µg/1 Benzene concentra- <br /> tion increased from 29 µg11 to 49 µg/l Total xylene concentration increased from 25 µg/l to 30 <br /> • <br /> Pg <br /> /I <br /> 0296-01 srpckton draft IQ01 doc 4 q'?§R <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.