Laserfiche WebLink
27 February 2012 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 10-1801 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> well utilizing pressure grouting techniques would significantly decrease the amount <br /> of time and space needed to destroy the well. The decrease in space and time to <br /> destroy the well would presumably lessen any potential traffic risks. <br /> • Wells MW-4A, MW-7A and MW-7B are located in the middle of a hotel parking lot <br /> and have a high exposure to hotel traffic. Work performed at wells MW-4A, MW-7A <br /> and MW-7B will require closing a portion of the parking lot to traffic, which will also <br /> cause an undue hardship to the business owners. <br /> • Wells MW-6B/EW-8B/EW-9B are located within the county roadway (Star Street), <br /> which poses a significant safety issue due to high exposure to traffic. The location <br /> of these wells are in an area where traffic is dense both during day and during night <br /> time hours. Acquiring a variance to destroy these wells utilizing pressure grouting <br /> techniques would significantly decrease the amount of time and space needed to <br /> destroy the wells. The decrease in space and time to destroy the well would <br /> presumably lessen any potential traffic delays and/or interruptions to traffic flow in <br /> the area. <br /> • Well MW-8B is located directly in front of the Delta Fire Department and poses a <br /> threat ofobstructing or hindering anyfire emergency response.Acquiring a variance <br /> to destroy this well utilizing pressure grouting techniques would significantly <br /> decrease the amount of time and space needed to destroy the wells. <br /> • Well MW-20A is located in the middle of the McDonald's restaurant parking lot and <br /> has a high exposure to restaurant traffic. Work performed at well MW-20A will <br /> require closing a portion of the parking lot to traffic, which will cause an undue <br /> hardship to the business owners. Acquiring a variance to destroy this well utilizing <br /> pressure grouting techniques would significantly decrease the amount of time and <br /> space needed to destroy the well. The decrease in space and time to destroy the <br /> well would presumably lessen any potential traffic risks. <br /> A summary of the most current soil (Appendix A) and ground water monitoring well <br /> analytical results (Table 1) has been included for your review. <br /> Based on results from the most recent monitoring event performed in September 2011, <br /> MTBE concentrations were detected at monitoring wells MW-4A MW-6B, MW-7A, MW-8B, <br /> EW-8B EW-9B and MW-20A. However, utilizing a plot of MTBE versus time and <br /> logarithmic trend line analysis, it can be reasonably projected that MTBE concentrations <br /> at these wells will be at or near non-detectable levels by October 2012 (Appendix B). <br /> Based on their locations, the low concentrations established, and MTBE trend graph <br /> analysis, wells MW-4A MW-6B MW-7A MW-8B, EW-8B, EW-9B and MW-20A should <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />