Laserfiche WebLink
• • <br /> Well Consultant's Request for a Variance EHD Review of Variance <br /> Designation to San Joaquin County Well Standards Request and Findings <br /> Initial review found all 14 wells listed <br /> All 14 Wells below met the criteria of the SJC Well <br /> Listed Below Standards for destruction by removal of <br /> the well, as wells are located in areas of <br /> known or suspected contamination. <br /> MW-3B Well passes through contaminated soil <br /> with MTBE at 32.5 feet and no <br /> confirmation soil samples were collected <br /> to show that the contaminants had <br /> Consultant agrees to remove the well. abated. <br /> MW-3C Well also passes through contaminated <br /> soil with MTBE at 32.5 feet and no <br /> confirmation soil samples were collected <br /> Consultant agrees to remove the well. to show that contaminants had abated. <br /> MW-4A Groundwater was found to be <br /> contaminated by MTBE,during last <br /> sampling event that occurred during the <br /> _period_of_active-groundwater extraction <br /> (GWE). <br /> Variance requested to be allowed to destroy <br /> well by pressure grouting due to: <br /> Traffic safety, EHD found the well is located in a hotel <br /> parking lot with no unusual traffic issues. <br /> Business convenience, Removal of the well will cause some <br /> inconvenience for the hotel and guests, <br /> but no more than when the well was <br /> installed. <br /> Trend analysis shows MTBE will not be The trend analysis is based on data <br /> detected in water samples after May 2011, collected during GWE, and may not be <br /> applicable to natural conditions without <br /> GWE. <br /> Page 1 of 9 <br />