My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000266
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
BANNER
>
6437
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0526345
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000266
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2019 4:04:26 PM
Creation date
2/5/2019 3:53:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0000266
RECORD_ID
PR0526345
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0017827
FACILITY_NAME
FLAG CITY SHELL
STREET_NUMBER
6437
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
BANNER
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
LODI
Zip
95242
APN
05532019
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
6437 W BANNER ST
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 1 of 1 <br /> Jennifer Worsley <br /> • From Mike Infurna [EH] [Mlnfurna@sjcehd com] <br /> Sent Tuesday, October 25, 2005 10 04 AM <br /> To Jennifer Worsley <br /> Subject RE response letter <br /> After l speak with the regulator who approved this system before I need confidence this system will do what your <br /> proposal says it will I'm reluctant to approve a system that has no history of working on a similar problem that this <br /> site is dealing with <br /> THe work plan is tentatively approved and I can release it NOW if you agree that whether or not you use the <br /> reactor, the GWE/plume migration will start immediately after the extraction wells are in and ready to pump <br /> (meaning, you'll have to deal with the purged water another way, as in trucked off, if the reactor isn't approved) <br /> Once started, the GWE is to continue as in no stopping because the reactor isn't doing what you said it would <br /> EHD reiterates it's primary intention Stop the MtBE migration offsite Do not impact the CSA wells 1 <br /> If you agree that with or without the reactor on line you can install the 5 GWE wells Oct 26, develop them ASAP, <br /> and plumb in the system ASAP, and start GWE ASAP, then I can approve the plan now and send you your copy <br /> But I'd rather gain the confidence that this thing works (history of it handling +50k ug/l MtBE at 20-25 gpm) <br /> consistently without breakdowns, reduced pumping rates, migration control and approve it all, then partially <br /> approve the concept now <br /> understand <br /> I lust heard from Joe O'Connel at ERI I'm ok with the theory as I told your engineer last week lt's the regulatory <br /> input I'm after I left a message for NCRWQCB staff Beth Lamb Joe said she's the one who approved the <br /> Healdsburg system on a similar site that now is closed IF that call goes well, I'll send/fax you the work plan <br /> approval letter <br /> -----Onginal Message----- <br /> From: Jennifer Worsley [mailto Jennifer@apexenvirotech com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 9 41 AM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: response letter <br /> Mike, <br /> When is Apex going to receive an approval/response letter for the workplan submitted 10117 We need a <br /> letter for our records <br /> Thanks <br /> Jennifer Worsley <br /> Project Manager <br /> Apex Envirotech, Inc <br /> Ph 916-851-0174 <br /> Fx 916-851-0177 <br /> 10/27/2005 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.