SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE

Home Browse Search

�I Page I of 2 Mike Infurna [EH] From: Mike Infurna [EH] Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 10:06 AM To: 'DAN IEL.B.ANZELON@saic.com' Subject: aplic problems Attachments: 26501 Banta Apl LCD notes Scanned_.pdf Daniel, I received your access agreements for the Banta Chev site. Thank you. Unfortunately, as I tried to issue the permits, I ran into some problems. Could you explain WHO's property do you plan on accessing for the proposed borings/configency borings noted on FIGURE 2—"BANTA ROAD—UPRR"work plan? DO see the one 'circle-cross' boring, the most southerly shown next to"cottage".. You show it EAST of the property line. Is it in Banta Rd? (County encroachment?). Then the two borings north of this one and north of the RR appear to be East of Banta Rd and it's unclear to me if they are in Banta Rd Right of way(ROW)or on PARCEL 88888888 just EAST of Banta Rd. And if so, who is the Property owner? AND the two other borings shown are slightly south east of these two and appear to be in "INDUSTRIAL LAND' shown on my assessor maps as parcel 252-150-11, owned by Alfred and Mabel Pombo. Do you plan to drill on MR. Pombo's land also? Or in the County right of way?Or in Parcel 8888888? See if you can set me straight on how I see this all. -You plan to drill on Parcel 252-010-03. (LYOTH OFFSITE-AG). Address 2633 S. Banta. Owned by the UPRR. PERMIT#1. No real problem here. -You plan to drill on Parcel 252-070-04. (LYOTH OFFSITE— Reed &Sons Towing Yard). 26457 S. Banta. Owned by Joe Kowalski. Permit#2. (Access agreement?) -.1 " " " Parcel 88888888. ?? UPRR property? County road/right of way?. Permit#3. -DO you plan to drill 80'-100' EAST of Banta Rd on Mr. Pombo's property as shown on Fig 2? Parcel 252-150-11. Address part of 26444 S. Banta Rd. Permit#4(if drilling is planned). Things you need to do in order for me to issue: 1-Reed Towing yard appears to be owned by other than John Nevins like you indicated on the permit application. County assessor shows Joe Kowalski as the landowner. Clear this up. I can change the name on the permit, but without the correct landowner's access agreement I can't issue a permit for this parcel. 2-Rail road boring locations are confusing. The most southerly boring on Fig 2 of the 29March WP is unclear. County ROW? UPRR? Indicate the parcel this one is on. 3-The boring locations shown the Fig 2, EAST of Banta Rd are confusing. What parcel are they are? Once understand WHERE they are, I can assign and issue the permit(s). Additionally, the permit application for the UPRR was NOT signed. Please open the attachment and print and sign the APPLICATION at the area noted by the big STAR in the left margin. Also attached is one of the two LCDs sent in. Neither has your name on it and I enclosed one to show you (at the bottom of the page noted by the arrow in the left margin). You can add your name or I can. You tell me it's ok with the driller(C-57)for me to add your name he's signing for and I'll do it. Then you only have to get the signed permit application back to me. Our Site Mitigation fee has increased July 1, 2006 to$285. Typically this is NOT needed if there has NOT been a change in the billing party ALREADY assigned to this site. If Chevron Env Mgmt(CEM) is NOT the billing party, then this fee is needed along with a new MFR to identify the new billing party. IF CEM is still the correct billing party, the$279 you included in the check may be needed for additional permit fees if you need them. Once I have a clear understanding of WHERE the borings are planned, I can calculate your fees. Any excess can be applied to CEMs account that will be needed for my inspection charges for grout inspections. 10/30/2006