Laserfiche WebLink
No Further Action Required Determination - 3 - 19 November 2009 <br /> Former Lyoth Loading Station <br /> •Lyoth Offsite <br /> 12 to 20 feet bgs. Soil and groundwater samples were collected and analyzed for TPH <br /> compounds. The results of the 102 soil samples submitted for analysis reported TPHc <br /> from ND to a maximum concentration of 70,000 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) in a <br /> sample from a depth of 13 feet bgs. All sample results for BTEX were ND and the <br /> PAHs were ND except for four results that were at or slightly over respective method <br /> detection limits (MDLs). TPH analysis for the majority of the remaining soil samples <br /> from depths between 13 and 25 feet bgs generally were ND. <br /> Eighteen groundwater samples were collected for TPHd, BTEX, and PAH analysis. <br /> Groundwater samples were not collected from the boring that was developed into <br /> monitoring well (MW)-2 where separate-phase crude oil was reported in soil and <br /> groundwater. Concentrations of TPHd in groundwater ranged primarily from ND to <br /> 4,900 micrograms per liter (pg/L) with 66,000 tag/L detected in one sample. The latter <br /> sample also contained total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH) at a <br /> concentration of 120,000 pg/L. The majority of the BTEX and PAHs analytical results <br /> were ND with the exception of some detections reported with the samples containing <br /> elevated TPHd and/or TRPH concentrations. <br /> • During 1999 Chevron's consultant completed and submitted a health risk assessment <br /> (HRA) for future site residents (on the former Lyoth facility) to OEHHA staff for review <br /> and determination of risk using a residential land use scenario for an adult/child. Risks <br /> were estimated for a reasonable maximum exposure scenario based on highest <br /> detected concentrations of the chemicals of potential concern - BTEX and PAHs <br /> identified by the earlier investigations. According to OEHHA's findings, the results <br /> indicated that there should be no unacceptable risk to future residents and concluded <br /> that no remedial action was necessary to make the site protective of human health <br /> under the scenarios evaluated. The hazard index (HI) for the areas of affected <br /> soil/groundwater is below 1. <br /> • In 2002, an addendum to the 1999 HRA was submitted to provide additional inhalation <br /> pathway information on concentration of benzene in one sample that was detected in <br /> shallow soil. The total risk determination was virtually unchanged and OEHHA <br /> concurred with the previous findings that the exposure risk remained as generally within <br /> a range of risk management and the findings were approved by OEHHA staff. Central <br /> Valley Water Board staff concurred in June 2006 and June 2007, respectively for both <br /> properties, that additional characterization was not needed. <br /> • Quarterly groundwater monitoring was conducted at the project beginning in 1997, <br /> semiannually starting July 2002, and annually from August 2007. Groundwater <br /> monitoring was discontinued in July 2008. In June 2009 Central Valley Water Board <br /> staff concurred with a workplan for destruction of the six groundwater monitoring wells. <br /> • SAIC provided a No Further Action Required Request Report (NFAR) for closure in May <br /> 2008. The NFAR included documentation of site conditions in accordance with the 16 <br /> April 2004 Appendix A — Tri-Regional Board Staff Recommendations for Preliminary <br /> Investigation and Evaluation of Underground Storage Tank Sites, Section 6.5 NFAR for <br /> Cases Exceeding Water Quality Objectives. <br /> • An environmental risk evaluation (ERE) dated January 2009 completed by SAIC for the <br /> Lyoth Offsite property determined that the potential exposure pathway to future <br /> residents/commercial workers is incomplete. In addition, the petroleum hydrocarbon <br />