Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 of 3 <br /> As for the address of the site, I have seen it listed and referred to as 880 Beechnut mainly, which is why I <br /> have used this address. But yes, I have also seen it referred to as 800 W. Beechnut Ave. This has <br /> confused me as well. I will confirm the exact address with Chevron and have updated the attached <br /> workplan to refer to 800 W. Beechnut Avenue. <br /> According to the March 1997 "Data Summary, Renown Property" report by Dames & Moore, wells A, B, C, <br /> and D were destroyed during excavation activities at the site in 1986. Let me know if you'd like me to send <br /> a copy of that report over to you. <br /> Please let me know if you have any other questions or comments. <br /> Thanks, <br /> Mari <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] [mailto:MInfurna@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 2:42 PM <br /> To: Mari Gilmore <br /> Subject: RE: Well Abandonments in Tracy <br /> I finally got the tirne to review your recent submittals.. <br /> I can issue the permits with conditions I'll list on the permit. <br /> I have old field notes and reports that indicate the REW wells are 4" PVC and built at least to 18' bgs. I will <br /> require these wells to be overbored to 18' plus 1 foot (19' bgs)with 10" augers..(Not 8.25" augers and not <br /> only to 18' bgs) <br /> I think found the permit from 1986 for"E" and "F". the application claims total depth at 18'. These PVC <br /> wells are 2" and the 8.25" augers may be used, but must go to 19' bgs also ( add the 1 foot.. <br /> if you modify your field work to include these changes I can take your assurances and I will issue the <br /> permits and you can count on doing the work May 28-29th like you noted. <br /> let me know. If not, IT have to write a comment letter and chances are you will have to schedule other, <br /> later dates. <br /> you've been doing this a long time now...have you ever installed 4° casings in an 8.25" auger? I never <br /> have nor allowed it. Real tough to drop sand and bent with less than a half inch between the OD of the <br /> casing and the ID of the augers... <br /> btw: END, the City of Tracy, The SJ County Assessor, and former Renown have all noted this site as"800 <br /> W. Beechnut", original APN: 231-530-09 and now lot line adjusted to parcel #234-070-04. There really <br /> is NO 880 Beechnut... the parcel across the street is"990 W. Beechnut"... <br /> these sites have confused me for 19 years now and 880, 900, or 800 and 990 have intermixed since I've <br /> been here. easy to see how you can get confused... <br /> do you know when monitoring wells, A, B, C and D were removed? <br /> Mike Infurna <br /> (209)468-3454 <br /> 5/9/2008 <br />