Laserfiche WebLink
! 0 <br /> Petryna KE (Karen) <br /> From: Margaret Lagorio [MLagorio@phs.hs.co.san-joaquin.ca.us] <br /> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2001 12:03 PM <br /> To: 'KEPetryna@equiva.com' <br /> Subject: 3011 Benjamin Holt, Stockton <br /> Karen, <br /> I have discussed this site with Michael Infurna and reviewed our file <br /> information. MTBE was first evidenced at this site in February 1997 . <br /> According to the California Code of Regulations the responsible parties are <br /> to submit quarterly reports that include proposed cleanup actions and a time <br /> schedule for implementing the proposed actions. <br /> Since the investigation at this site was not progressing in a timely manner, <br /> PHS/EHD provided a Problem Assessment Report (PAR) submittal date of <br /> December 7, 2001, in our letter dated February 27, 2001, and detailed that <br /> the PAR was to describe the lateral and vertical extent of the problem and <br /> propose remedial actions. That letter also gave a work plan submittal date <br /> of March 26, 2001. The work plan was not submitted until June 25, 2001 . <br /> PHS/EHD staff and CVRWQCB staff met with you and your consultants to discuss <br /> all the Shell and Texaco sites in San Joaquin County on June 19, 2001, <br /> because PHS/EHD staff do not feel that work on these sites progresses in a <br /> timely manner. In that meeting it was again discussed that the PAR for this <br /> site was due. <br /> The work plan submitted June 25, 2001, was approved by PHS/EHD on June 29, <br /> 2001, and the work was completed on July 30, 2001 . The report of that work <br /> was submiited to PHS/EHD on September 17, 2001 . Unfortunately, the lateral <br /> and vertical extent of contamination was not defined by that scope of work <br /> and you submitted another work plan on October 15, 2001, which PHS/EHD <br /> approved with conditions on October 17, 2001. <br /> The October 2001 work plan activities are scheduled to be performed <br /> December 10-19, 2001 . You will not be able to submit a PAR by December 7, <br /> 2001, since you have not defined the extent of the contamination yet, so you <br /> have asked for an extension for submittal of the PAR. <br /> PHS/EHD will not extend the PAR submittal date, but will not initiate non <br /> compliance action if the PAR is submitted by January 19, 2002. Please <br /> evaluate now if you will need to install monitoring wells to confirm your <br /> CPT data and propose and plan for their installation soon after or at the <br /> same time that you are performing the additional CPT work in December 2001 . <br /> In addition, consider moving CPT14 north of MW1 to investigate the vertical <br /> extent of contamination downgradient of that well which has evidenced MTBE <br /> in the shallow groundwater in that area. <br /> Other responsible parties have combined reports and work plans to complete <br /> investigations quicker and you should consider this for all your sites . <br /> I hope this clarifies our position. <br /> Margaret <br /> 1 <br />