Laserfiche WebLink
ivow <br /> f� <br /> CHAPTER 2 <br /> FIELD METHODS <br /> The existing groundwater monitoring wells were sampled on May 11 <br /> and 12, 1987, by Brown and Caldwell (BC) personnel. Prior to <br /> sampling, approximately 25 to 30 gallons of water , representing three <br /> to four well volumes, were purged from each well using a centrifugal <br /> pump. During purging, the pH, specific conductance, and temperature <br /> of the discharged water were monitored. After these parameters had <br /> stabilized (when three consecutive readings, taken 5 minutes apart, <br /> are within 10 percent of each other) , a sample was collected with a <br /> Teflon bailer equipped with a bottom-emptying valve. Each sample was <br /> then drained directly from the bottom valve into four 40-milliliter <br /> glass bottles with Teflon-lined septums and into one 1/2-liter <br /> plastic bottle containing nitric acid preservative. On May 15 , 1987 , <br /> BC personnel sampled the City of Stockton Municipal Utility District <br /> (City) wells 20M2, 20F1, and San Joaquin County Flood Control <br /> District (District) well 20Ll. All three wells are currently in <br /> operation, and were running at the time of sample collection. Each <br /> sample was collected from the tap located on the discharge line of <br /> the pump. The tap was allowed to run for 15 to 30 minutes prior to <br /> sampling. Each sample was collected in four 40-milliliter glass <br /> bottles with Teflon-lined septums and into one 1/2-liter plastic <br /> bottle with nitric acid preservative. The samples were stored on ice <br /> from the time of collection through delivery to BC' s California <br /> Department of Health Services state-certified analytical laboratory <br /> in Emeryville , California. Prior to each use, all groundwater <br /> sampling equipment was washed with laboratory detergent and tap <br /> water , then rinsed with deionized water . Pending results of the <br /> analytical tests, all groundwater produced during well purging and <br /> sampling was contained and temporarily stored on site in 55-gallon <br /> drums. Photoionization detector (PID) measurements were taken from <br /> each well to identify relative hydrocabon vapor concentrations. <br /> On May 26, 198741 seven boreholes were drilled. The boreholes <br /> were drilled by P.C. Exploration, Inc. , with a truck-mounted drilling <br /> rig equipped with 4-inch-inside-diameter and 8-inch-outside-diameter <br /> hollow-stem augers. P.C. Exploration, Inc. , has a C-57 contractors <br /> license. The locations of the boreholes are shown on Figure 1-3. <br /> Each borehole was advanced to approximately 10 feet. Soil <br /> samples for lithologic classification and laboratory analyses were <br /> collected at 5-foot intervals by using an 18-inch-long by 2-inch- <br /> diameter Modified California-type sampler with 6-inch-long brass tube <br /> liners. The drive sampler was driven ahead of the auger into undis- <br /> turbed soil Each borehole was logged from the samples taken at <br /> 5-foot intervals, using the Unified Soil Classification system. <br /> i - <br /> t <br />