Laserfiche WebLink
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> oPQU.�" SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> urrit su ervisr•� <br /> o <br /> Donna K. Heran,R.E.H.S. P <br /> Director. 304 East Weber Avenue, Third Floor Carl Sol gman, R.E.N.S. <br /> ' Al Olson,R.E.H.S. Stockton, California 95202-2708 Mike Huggins,R.E.H.S .,R.D.I. <br /> ' Douglas W. Wilson.R <br /> ., CP Program Maf�n,�rr Tele phone: 209 468-3420 Margaret Lzr olio, R.E..H.S. <br /> 4L�F6.A4 Laurie A.Cotulla, R.E.H.S. 1 ( � 5' S <br /> Program Manogcr Fax: (209) 464-0138 Robert McClellon, R.E.H.S. <br /> Marie Bareellos, R.r.H.s. <br /> 0 0 7 2005 <br /> DARIN ROUSE PAUL SUPPLE <br /> CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANY ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY <br /> PO BOX 6004 BLDG V PO BOX 6549 <br /> SAN RAMON CA 94583 MORAGA CA 94570 ❑ <br /> RE: Chevron #94275 and ARCO #2133 <br /> 2905 and 2908 Ben Holt Drive <br /> Stockton CA 95207 <br /> The above referenced contaminated underground storage tank sites have applied to the <br /> California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Clean Up Fund for designation as <br /> a co-mingled plume. The claim reference number for this application is CP0034. Per the <br /> conditions of the application, the claimants are required to have entered into a written <br /> agreement to provide for a coordinated corrective action, and are to proceed with that action <br /> as soon as practicable. <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (SJCIEHD) has reviewed the <br /> respective files for these two sites and found that neither site has completed definition of their <br /> respective contaminant plumes. Neither site has conducted a vertical investigation of the <br /> groundwater contamination. Despite repeated directives by this agency to do so, Chevron <br /> has declined to investigate the lateral extent of the groundwater contamination reported over <br /> the years in monitoring wells MW-4 and MW-3. Review of soil analytical data from the <br /> Chevron site indicates widespread contamination onsite, residing primarily from 15 to at least <br /> 31 feet below surface grade (bsg). The maximum depth of soil contamination assessed at <br /> this site has been in soil boring (VDSB-1), the only one extending to 45 feet bsg. <br /> Hydrocarbon contamination in soil samples collected from VDSB-1 at 31.5 feet and deeper <br /> was not detectable, however, soil samples collected at 35 and 31 feet bsg from monitoring <br /> wells MWA and MW-2.respectively did report detections of petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> contamination. Review of soil analytical data from the ARCO site indicates that vertical <br /> f° definition of the soil contamination was not completed. As previously noted, the vertical <br /> extent of impacted groundwater on the site has not been assessed. CPT data collected <br /> offsite indicates the vertical extent of impacted groundwater in that area to be between 40 <br /> and 68 feet bsg, but the area assessed has not been demonstrated to be in the predominant <br /> contaminant migration pathway from either site. <br /> ARCO #2133 conducted interim remediation by groundwater extraction, and has been <br /> conducting air sparging since 1995. A conditionally approved draft final remediation plan <br /> submitted on behalf of ARCO.to conduct soil vapor extraction was implemented, but could <br /> not be continued due to rising groundwater levels. Chevron#9-4275 has been conducting <br /> rair sparging under a conditionally approved corrective action plan (CAP) that was never fully <br /> implemented. As with the ARCO site, rising groundwater levels made soil vapor extraction of <br /> the contaminated soil intervals impossible. Please demonstr6ie that air sparging without <br /> benefit of-soil vapor extraction is providing a beneficial result and is not merely spreading and <br /> diluting the plume of impacted groundwater. <br />