My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
BENJAMIN HOLT
>
2908
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544111
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/7/2019 12:29:29 PM
Creation date
2/7/2019 10:28:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0544111
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003625
FACILITY_NAME
ARCO STATION #83560*
STREET_NUMBER
2908
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
BENJAMIN HOLT
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
09763032
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2908 W BENJAMIN HOLT DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
551
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
`..+' W <br /> August 9, 1994 ARCO Meeting Page 2 <br /> 7906 N. El Dorado St., Stockton ARCO Facility #2130 <br /> PHS/EHD contact - Michael Infurna <br /> The recently submitted Problem Assessment Report(PAR)requires an addendum evaluating an additional <br /> remedial alternative and a feasibility study as per the Corrective Action Regulations, a copy of which was <br /> provided to you during the meeting. A permit application with an $89 fee to install the additional wells <br /> should also be submitted, as proposed in the PAR. The monitoring well recently covered with a new asphalt <br /> layer is to be located, repaired as necessary, and sampled immediately. An update to the site map shall be <br /> submitted and PHS/EHD requests that the "B" designations of wells be dropped in an attempt to avoid <br /> confusion. The wells which are currently hooked up to the vapor extraction system should be clearly <br /> presented. Quarterly monitoring reports for first and second quarter, 1994 are to be submitted to PHS/EHD <br /> immediately and future reports shall be submitted prior to the next quarter's monitoring event. A complete <br /> "zero" line for both soil and groundwater has not been delineated. Proposals to complete this requirement <br /> shall be included within a PAR addendum along with a time schedule for their timely implementation. <br /> 441 W. Charter Way, Stockton ARCO Facility #2168 <br /> PHS/EHD contact - Michael Infurna <br /> Quarterly reports are overdue for this site and both first and second quarter 1994 reports shall be submitted <br /> to PHS/EHD and CVRWQCB immediately. Future quarterly reports shall be submitted prior to the next <br /> quarter's monitoring. An addendum to the PAR shall be submitted and will include a discussion and a <br /> feasibility study for an additional alternative remediation proposal that would restore the groundwater to <br /> beneficial use status. Further discussions shall be scheduled to consider the possible off site and upgradient <br /> source(s) of groundwater contamination and shall include other responsible parties, as well as PHS/EHD <br /> and Arco representatives. <br /> 800 E. Kettleman, Lodi ARCO Facility 2076 <br /> PHD/EHD contact - Mary Meays <br /> The groundwater sample results of the "Fourth Quarter Monitoring Report" evidenced groundwater <br /> contamination. Kyle Christie indicated that there was some problems with the decontamination procedures <br /> which were being used by the sampling firm. There are no plans to begin soil remediation within the next <br /> year; however, the groundwater will continued to be monitored and sampled quarterly. <br /> 1612 Hammer Lane, Stockton ARCO Facility #548 <br /> PHS/EHD contact - Mary Meays <br /> The contents of the PAR were discussed and the addendum which was requested by PHS/EHD was <br /> submitted at the meeting. <br /> The contamination which was detected in MW6, during the first quarter 1994, may have been a result of <br /> the decontamination procedures used because numerous sites which had never evidenced groundwater <br /> contamination had detectable contamination during this sampling event. PHS/EHD was informed that no <br /> contamination was detected in the samples collected during the second quarter monitoring event, thus <br /> indicating that the groundwater plume has been defined. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.