My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000480
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
BENJAMIN HOLT
>
2908
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544111
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000480
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/7/2019 3:27:27 PM
Creation date
2/7/2019 2:35:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0000480
RECORD_ID
PR0544111
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003625
FACILITY_NAME
ARCO STATION #83560*
STREET_NUMBER
2908
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
BENJAMIN HOLT
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
09763032
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2908 W BENJAMIN HOLT DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms Laurie Cotulla <br /> April 29, 1992 <br /> Page 9 <br /> 2. Thermal Oxidation Thermal oxidation requires supplemental propane or natural gas <br /> ARCO's Health and Safety policy discourages the use of a propane tank at ARCO <br /> stations In addition, the use of propane or other supplemental fuel would result in high <br /> operatmg cost compared with catalytic oxidation. <br /> 3. Catalytic Oxidation Catalytic oxidation would be a cost-effective treatment method <br /> for the extracted vapors A 100 cubic-feet-per-minute (cfm) catalytic oxidizer will be <br /> capable of oxidizing approximately 110 pounds of hydrocarbons per day [3,000 parts <br /> per million (ppm) at 100 cam] at a low average operating cost The power consumption <br /> is typically low at the start of vapor extraction when hydrocarbon concentrations are <br /> relatively high, then increases over time as the hydrocarbon concentrations in the soil <br /> are reduced Should a system failure occur, BCC personnel would be notified by an <br /> autodial or other similar telemetry system <br /> The soil vapor treatment system will be located adjacent to the existing groundwater extraction <br /> system The proposed locations of the vapor extraction wells and piping is presented on <br /> Figure 3 The actual locations of the vapor extraction wells and piping will be determined by <br /> a number of factors including field conditions (existing underground piping etc ) The vapor <br /> extraction piping will be buried at an approximate depth of 3 feet bgs The depth of the vapor <br /> extraction wells will be determined in the field during drilling and will be based on the depth to <br /> groundwater and lithology <br /> Currently, a groundwater extraction system is in place and operational at this site The <br /> implementation of the soil vapor extraction system will reduce hydrocarbon concentrations in the <br /> soil as well as the groundwater <br /> If you have any questions about this addendum, please contact me at (916) 444-0123 <br /> Sincerely, <br /> BRO AND CALDWELL CONSULTANTS <br /> t <br /> Steven D Misner wreFli � P` s <br /> X* <br /> Project Manager Ca�ifoirimg�� Geologist#3710 <br /> SDM.jrb <br /> 4F CpUFO�`�i`� <br /> cc. Mr Chuck Carmel, ARCO Products Company <br /> Mr Chris Wmsor, ARCO Products Company <br /> Ms Elizabeth Thayer, Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region <br /> Mr Frank Tucker, City of Stockton <br /> Stockton Public Library <br /> Rmwn and Caldwell 67474tFsP0RTS\6747-04.LTR <br /> Consultants <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.