Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> Ms. Marla Guensler <br /> Exxon Company, U.S.A. <br />�S October 16, 1995 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Ground Water Sampling and Analytical Re u�lt.. <br /> Ground water samples were collected from the monitoring wells using the field procedures described <br /> in Enclosure A. An additional ground water sample was collected from monitoring well MW-5 on <br /> July 27, 1995, prior to and following the overpurging approximately of 250 gallons of water from <br /> the well. Quarterly ground water monitoring sampling was performed on August 31, 1995, from <br /> monitoring wells MW-4, MW-5, and MW-6. Monitoring well MW-5 was overpurged on <br /> August 31, 1995, prior to quarterly sampling with a centrifugal pump. Approximately 240 gallons <br /> of water was removed. A ground water sample could not be collected from monitoring well MW-3 <br /> on August 31, 1995, because the well had been paved over. Following removal of the pavement, <br /> a ground water sample was collected from monitoring well MW-3 on September 11, 1995. <br /> All ground water samples collected from the site visits in July, August, and September 1995 were <br /> submitted to Sequoia Analytical (a California-certified laboratory) for analysis of benzene, toluene, <br /> ethylbenzene, total xylenes (BTEX), and total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline. <br /> Cumulative analytical test results are summarized in Table 2. Ground water samples collected from <br /> monitoring wells MW-3 through MW-6 did not contain detectable concentrations of petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons during the third quarter quarterly monitoring event performed on August 31 and <br /> September 11, 1995, however, the ground water samples collected from monitoring well MW-5 on <br />!` July 27, 1995, reported benzene concentrations of 0.62 and 1.2 micrograms per liter (µg/L) prior to, <br /> and following overpurging of the well, respectively. Copies of the laboratory's analytical reports and <br /> chain of custody documentation for this sampling event are presented in Enclosure B. <br /> Discussion <br /> Delta proposes to conduct a soil vapor extraction test using MW-5 to evaluate the concentration of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon vapors in the vicinity of this well. <br /> Future Work <br /> The next quarterly monitoring event for this site is scheduled for November 1995. <br /> Remarks/Signatures <br /> The interpretations contained in this report represent our professional opinions, and are based in part, <br /> on information supplied by the client. These opinions are based on currently available information <br /> and are arrived at in accordance with currently accepted hydrogeologic and engineering practices at <br /> this time and location. Other than this, no warranty is implied or intended. <br /> Delta recommends that copies of this report be forwarded to the following agencies: <br /> Mr. Mike Infurna Ms. EIizabeth Thayer <br /> Environmental Management Division California Regional Water Quality Control Board, <br /> Public Health Services Central Valley Region <br /> San Joaquin County 3443 Routier Road <br /> Post Office Box 2009 Sacramento, California 95827-3098 <br /> Stockton, California 95201 <br />