Laserfiche WebLink
f <br /> 05 November 2001 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 95-0106 <br />�. Page 4.of 5 <br /> ' MW-3 and MW-6 limits the extent of-dissolved hydrocarbons northeastward of the,site. <br /> - Analytical data from..monitoring well MW-5'limits the extent of dissolved hydrocarbons <br /> north-westward.of the site.. The extent of dissolved hydrocarbons-to the east is.,,not,well <br />' defined.at this time; it appears that the plume of contaminated ground water may have shifted <br /> to the east. <br /> • As can'be'seen on.Table 2, TPH-g concentrations were generally higher in groundwater <br />' samples collected*from the offsite well MWA, than in the on:-site well, MW-1;.however', , <br /> *benzene concentrations have generally been higher in samples from MW-1'. <br /> • Continued detection of TPH-g and BTEX in ground water samples collected fromthe off-site <br /> well MW4 indicates that the plume of impacted,ground water has miated off-site towards <br /> the north, however, the general lack'of detection of hydrocarbons in the-MW-7, MW-6; ' <br /> MW-5' and MW-3 wells shows,that the plume'is not wide-spread and' has not migrated <br /> northeast of MW-4 or northwest of the former UST pit. <br /> •• The extent of the plume around MW-4 is constrained by data from MW-6 toward the north- <br /> northeast, MW-5 toward the southwest and MW-7 toward-the east relative to MW-4. The <br /> northwestern'extent of the plume from MW-4 is riot well constrained. <br /> OP <br /> The results of this and previous,monitoring events and previous soil'investigations leads AGE to <br /> conclude that. <br /> The hydrocarbons encountered in groundwater samples•from MW-1 'and MW-4 represent <br />' ,s a northward extension of the:hydrocarbon-impacted ground water:that had already reached <br /> its,cui-rent extent at the time the monitoring well system was installed beginning in 1996. <br /> The hydrocarbons encountered in ground water samples from MW-7 collected'.during the <br />' 'previou§.quarter may have been ah6malous, <br /> • The variation of hydrocarbon'concentrations in samples collected from MW=1'.and MW-4 <br /> maybe=due to.the closer'proximity of MW-1 to impacted soil left in.place near.the,former. <br /> UST'site. <br /> 6.0. RECOMMENDATIONS <br />' AGE recommends continued quarterly montoring of the monitoring well network. The next ; <br /> monitoring event should be`scheduled for'November 2001. <br /> Advanced GeuEnvironmental,Inc. <br />