Laserfiche WebLink
'. 05 June 2001' . <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 95-0106 <br /> quarters of 1999, the first quarter of 2000 and the second quarter.of 2001. Additionally, - <br />' TPH-g was detected in MW-7 for the first time since monitoring began in 1998. <br /> • .• Analytical data from monitoring well' MW-2 limits the:horizontal; extent of dissolved: <br /> hydrocarbons southward of the site. Analytical data from well MW-3 and MW-6 limits the ; <br /> extent of dissolved hydrocarbons northeastward of the site. Analytical-data from monitoring <br /> well MW-5 limits the,extent of dissolved' hydrocarbons'north-westward of the site. The <br />' extent of dissolved hydrocarbons to.the east is not well defined at this time; it appears,that. •' <br /> the plume of contaminated ground water may have shifted to the east. <br /> • As can be seen on Table' 2, TPH-g concentrations were generally higher in ground water <br /> samples collected from the offsite well MW-4 than in the ori-site well, MW-1,however,. <br /> benzene concentrations have generally been higher in samples from MW-1. <br /> Continued detection of TPH-g and BTEX in ground water samples collected from the off-site <br /> well MW4,.and the recent detection of TPH-g in MW-7,indicates that.the plume of impacted' <br /> ground water has migrated off-site towards the north and east, however, the general lack of <br /> detection of hydrocarbons in the MW-6,MW-5 and MW-3 wells shows that the plume isnot <br /> wide=spread and has not migrated.northeast of MW-4 or northwest of the former UST pit. <br />� . • The.extent of the plume around MW-4 is constrained by data from MW-6,toward the north- <br /> ' northeast, and MW-5 toward,the southwest relative to MW-4. The northwesternand <br /> southeastern extent of the plume from MW-4 is not well,con' <br /> thrained. <br /> The results of this and previous monitoring events and previous soil investigations leads AGE to <br /> conclude that: <br /> • The hydrocarbons encountered in ground water samples,from MW-1 and MW-4,represent' <br />' a northward extension of.the..hydrocarbon-impacted ground water that had already reached ' <br /> its current extent at the tithe the monitoring well'system was installed beginning in 1996.The . <br /> hydrocarbons encountered iri•ground water samptes'from MW-7 may.represent a recent, <br /> eastward extension of the hydrocarbon-impacted ground water. <br /> The variation of liydrocarbon coriceriirations in.sainples collected from MW-1'and MW-4 ' <br /> maybe due to its closer proximity to'impacted soil left in place near the former UST site: <br /> 6.0. RECOMMENDATIONS± <br />' AGE'recommends continued ;quarterly _montoring:of.the rrionitoring .well network: The next <br /> monitoring event should be scheduled for August 2001..The workplan addendum recently approved <br /> J Advanced GieoEnvlronmental,Inc. <br />