Laserfiche WebLink
The soil boring Iocations were selected to attempt to provide reasonable delineation of the vertical and <br /> i <br /> horizontal extent of petroleum hydrocarbon impact. Upon arrival on site'to perform the borings, boring <br /> SB-2 was moved approximately 3 feet toward the north due to the presence of a utility corridor. After <br /> completion of the soil sampling and boring activities,the borings were abandoned using Portland cement <br /> from the bottom of the hole to about 1.5 feet below the existing ground surface. A concrete cap was then <br /> `• placed from approximately 1.5 to the surface. <br /> i <br /> 3.2 Soil Sample Collection '} _ <br /> 4 Soil samples were collected at five foot intervals from each soil.boring using a California modified <br /> �t <br /> stainless steel split spoon sampler. The sampler contained three stainless-steel sleeves which were used <br /> to collect the soil inside the sampler. Upon retrieval of the split spoon from the soil boring, a stainless- <br /> steel sleeve of soil was selected for laboratory analysis and the remainingisoil was used for field <br /> observations. Soil from each sample was collected into plastic ziplock bags to field screen for petroleum <br /> !� <br /> hydrocarbon contaminants using a photoionization detector(PID). !Each soil sample was classified based <br /> on physical properties and recorded on a soil boring log(Appendix`tB). Based on PID results and field <br /> observations, soil samples were selected for laboratory analysis. <br /> it <br /> The hollow stem augers and sampling equipment were decontaminated using a high pressure steam <br /> E <br />' cleaning unit between each soil boring. The stainless-steel split spoon sampler was cleaned with an <br /> Alconox® wash followed by a rinse with deionized water between sample intervals. The <br /> decontamination cleaning procedures are used to avoid cross contamination between soil borings and soil <br /> samples. <br /> 3. <br /> !Y <br /> The soil samples, collected in stainless-steel tubes,were sealed with Teflon swatches, capped, labeled, <br /> preserved on ice, and submitted under proper chain-of-custody documentation for chemical analyses to <br /> Calscience Environmental Laboratories, Inc. The analytical laboratory report for the investigation is <br /> provided as Appendix A to this report. The soil analytical data are!summarized in Table 1., <br /> 3.3 Analysis Methods <br /> ;E <br /> All samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as`diesel (TPH-d)by EPA <br /> Method 8015-modified. <br /> 6 r <br />