WORK PLANS - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

S E C 0 R -- (ESLs) (RWQCB, 2005), USEPA Region 9's preliminary remediation goals (PRGs) (USEPA, 2004a), or DHS' NLs(Cal-EPA, 2006b)when there are no regulatory limits or criteria. It should be noted that SLs used in the Tier 1 RBCA are not regulatory cleanup standards and the presence of a chemical at concentrations which exceed SLs do not necessarily indicate that adverse impacts to human health and the environment are occurring or will occur in the future. It merely indicates that further evaluation may be warranted (Cal-EPA, 2005b; USEPA, 2004a; RWQCB, 2005). Further evaluation may include additional sampling, consideration of ambient levels, or reassessment of the assumptions used to calculate the SLs(Cal-EPA, 2005b) used in the Tier 1 RBCA. The applicable SLs to be used in the Tier 1 RBCA are dependent on the potentially complete exposure pathways (e.g., volatilizing from soil or groundwater into indoor air, leaching from soil to groundwater, etc.) at the Site, which are determined by developing a SCM. The SCM contains a graphical and narrative description showing the extent of known soil contamination and groundwater degradation relative to the leaking UST and potential receptors (RWQCB, 2004a). The SCM may reveal that, although concentrations of site contaminants in groundwater may exceed the RWQCB's water quality objectives, there are no potentially complete exposure pathways, such as there are no current or anticipated uses of the impacted groundwater, and further analysis is not warranted. When an SL is exceeded in a Tier 1 RBCA and a potentially complete exposure pathway exists, a Tier 2 RBCA analysis is conducted using simple fate and transport models with site-specific data (e.g., soil type, hydraulic conductivity, hydraulic gradient, etc.) and USEPA or Cal-EPA exposure factors and toxicity values. When site-specific data are not available, conservative values from literature may be used. These simple fate and transport models can be used to predict the actual and potential exposures at the potential receptors' locations, and to develop site-specific target level (SSTLs) (ASTM, 2002). When Tier 2 SSTLs are exceeded, remediation can be implemented until SSTLs for risk-driving chemicals are achieved, or a Tier 3 RBCA analysis can be performed to provide a more complex assessment, which may include additional site assessment, probabilistic evaluations, and sophisticated chemical fate and transport models (ASTM, 2002).j There are cases where actual and potential health risks can be ;`estimated in the Tier 2 RBCA to determine if current site conditions pose unacceptable health risks to potentially exposed populations, without Tier 2 SSTLs being derived (as in the case of this RBCA). This forward risk calculation can be simpler than the backward calculation of medium-specific SSTLs when different fate and transport models are used in several exposure pathways. 7