Laserfiche WebLink
r �... S E C O R �..c <br /> reflect a target hazard quotient (HQ) of 1, ESLs based on noncarcinogenic effects reflect a target HQ of <br /> 0.2 (or 0.5 for TPHg). It should be noted that not all PRGs, CHHSLs, and ESLs for soil are risk-based <br /> levels. They can be based on saturation levels (denoted"sat"), or ceiling limit of 100,000 mg/kg(denoted <br /> "max") (USEPA, 2004a; Cal-EPA, 2005b; and RWQCB, 2005), or background levels (RWQCB, 2005). <br /> Per the USEPA (USEPA, 1991), the acceptable multi-chemical and multi-pathway ECR range is from 1E- <br /> 04 to 1E-06, with 1E-06 being point of departure; and the acceptable multi-pathway noncarcinogenic HQ <br /> for a single chemical or multi-chemical and multi-pathway hazard index (Hl) (segregated by toxic effects) <br /> for all COPCs is 1.0 (the HI is calculated by summing the chemical-specific and/or pathway-specific HQs). <br /> Therefore, use of ESLs can account for up to five risk-driving chemicals with an HQ of 0.2 to meet the <br /> cumulative HI of 1.0. <br /> In California, under the Proposition 65 program, the "no significant risk levels" represent the daily intake <br /> level calculated to result in a cancer risk not exceeding one excess case of cancer in 100,000 individuals <br /> exposed over a 70-year lifetime (Cal-EPA, 2006c). As such, Cal-EPA uses a target ECR of 1E-05 for <br /> individual carcinogenic chemicals to warn the public of potential carcinogens in every day products. <br /> Cumulative ECR of 1E-04 must not be exceeded to the exposed populations, including sensitive <br /> subgroups. <br /> According to Cal-EPA (Cal-EPA, 2001), an individual's actual risk of contracting cancer from exposure to <br /> a chemical is often less than the theoretical risk to the entire potentially exposed population estimated in a <br /> risk assessment. This may be due to difference in intake rate or a shorter time of occupancy in the area <br /> of concern. Moreover, an individual's risk not only depends on the individual exposure to a specific <br /> chemical, but also on his/her genetic background, health, diet, and lifestyle choice. Cal-EPA states that <br /> ECRs in a risk assessment are often compared to the overall background risk of cancer in the general <br /> U.S. population (about 250,000 cases for every one million people) or to the risk posed by all harmful <br /> chemicals in a particular medium, such as the air. For example, the ECR from breathing current levels of <br /> pollutants in California's ambient air over a 70-year lifetime is estimated to be 760 in one million (or 8E- <br /> 04) (Cal-EPA, 2001). <br /> 12 <br />