My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
BROOK HOLLOW
>
6331
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0526755
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2019 4:19:41 PM
Creation date
2/11/2019 3:39:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0526755
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0018115
FACILITY_NAME
BROOKSIDE ASSOCIATION
STREET_NUMBER
6331
STREET_NAME
BROOK HOLLOW
STREET_TYPE
CIR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95219
APN
11637026
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
6331 BROOK HOLLOW CIR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Valley Water Treatment Page 3 <br /> Corrective Action Plan <br /> ' GPE Project No.480.3 <br /> December 12,2006 <br /> ' If a soil vapor extraction system were constructed, the existing MW-1 could <br /> be used as an extraction well. Costs would include two, 1,000-pound carbon <br /> filters, at the surface equipment, and system monitoring on a twice a week <br /> ' schedule. Assuming the system were installed and operated for one year, and <br /> that no changes of carbon were needed, the following table summarizes the <br /> major anticipated costs: <br /> Item Unit Cost Units Total Cost <br /> System Design&Plan $4,000 1 $4,100 <br /> Surface Equipment $5,000 1 $5,000 <br /> Carbon and Canisters $4,000 2 $8,000 <br /> Air Permitting $1,500 1 $1,500 <br /> System Operation $2,500/Mo 12 $30,000 <br /> TOTAL $48,500 <br /> 1 Soil Vapor Extraction with Air Sparging <br /> In cases where the contaminant mass extends below the water table, <br /> sparging of air or other oxygenating gasses below the groundwater surface is <br /> ' usually helpful in expediting the removal of the contaminant mass as <br /> compared to vapor extraction alone. It clearly is even more, expensive than <br /> ' simple vapor extraction, however, and is therefore unlikely to be cost- <br /> competitive with excavation. <br /> ' Excavation <br /> In general, excavation has the virtue of rapidly removing contaminant mass <br /> from the subsurface environment, but it is frequently not an attractive <br /> remedial alternative due to the high expense. In this case however, the very <br /> limited volume of impacted soil in conjunction with the shallow depth mean <br /> that a very small excavation can have a profound effect in removing the bulk <br /> of the contaminant mass. We estimate that a total excavation of 30 to 50 <br /> cubic yards of soil will achieve the desired effect, and will cost about $17,000. <br /> Evaluation <br /> Comparison of the virtues of the various alternatives described above, <br /> ' suggest that a limited excavation offers the best method of mitigating this <br /> release. <br /> 4.0 SCOPE OF WORK <br /> The following tasks will be completed to accomplish the goals of this Work <br /> Plan: <br /> 2937 Veneman Ave.,#13240 Geo-Phase Environmental Inc. Phone(209)569-0293 <br /> Modesto,CA 95356 Fax(209)569-0295 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.