Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> .•-•.. :-:.::. -.• •-.:mss 5,.._. - �::-'.:.. -- r .a.. .. -- - ,.. .� . _ -=1 1 -- .. -- - :•-: .. .. -_r .;.n.. . , .-..._ <br /> i28April 20'0 <br /> .AGE-NC Project No.-98-0440 <br /> 1 'Page 6 of 7 .y <br /> 4.0. SUNIlIIARY AND CONCLUSIONS - <br /> n, Based on the:'data collected.during`this monitoring period, AGE concludes: <br /> • -Damp to.saturated, gray to brown, silty sand was encountered at 10 feet and 20 feet bsg in <br /> borings MW7 and MW8.Dry to saturated,brown, silty clay and clay were encountered at all <br />' other depths in borings MW7 through MWl0. <br /> • Depths to'ground water ranged from 12.90 feet to 13.77 feet below the well casing tops. <br /> Ground water elevations at the site ranged from 26.33 feet above mean sea level (MSL) in <br /> 1' well MW8 to 27.34 feet above MSL in well MW 1: On 12 December 2002,the ground water <br /> ' at the site was inferred io be flowing toward the northeast under an average gradient of 0:006 <br />' feet/feet across the area monitored. <br /> • No analytes were detected at or above laboratory reporting limits in the soil samples . <br /> collected from wells MW7 through MW 10. The approximate extent of petroleum <br />' hydrocarbon-impacted soil is depicted on figures 5, 6 and 7. <br /> The highest concentration of dissolved Hydrocarbons quantified as TPH-g, TPH-d and BTEX <br />' . compounds extends northeast from,USTs No. 4 and 5. Dissolved hydrocarbons were <br /> encountered in the down-gradient direction from the former USTs in samples from <br /> monitoring wells MW2, MW5,"-MW7 and MW8. Dissolved hydrocarbon 'concentrations <br /> remained non-detectable in samples from,wells MW1, MW3 and MW4. Concentrations <br /> decreased to non-detectable' lever in well MW6. - It would appear that petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon-impacted ground water is migrating along the sand zone encountered at 10 to <br /> 15 feet bsg."A map showing the approximate extent of dissolved benzene and the areal ' <br /> location of the two sand zones encountered at 10 and 20 feet.bsg is presented in Figure 8. <br /> The concentrations of benzene detected-in the water:samples collected from wells MW2; <br /> MW5 and MW8 were above the State of California maximum contaminant level(MCL) of <br /> 1.0 µg/l for benzene in drinldng water. <br /> The lateral extent of petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted ground water has not been defined <br /> 'toward the northeast beyond MW7 and MW8.The hydrocarbon plume is fairly well defined, <br /> to'the south, east;west and northwest. <br />' 5.0. RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based on'the findings of this investigation,AGE recommends'continued*quarterlymonitoring of the <br /> t ground water monitoring wells. The next monitoring event was performed in Mauch 2003. In <br /> Addition, AGE recommends a corrective action plan(CAP) be prepared for the site. . <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />