Laserfiche WebLink
' .. 24 July2001, . • • ' ' , .- ,•- ' ,J 1 <br /> • AGE-NC Pro'ect No. 98-0440 <br />' 1'P age 3 of4"", <br /> The ground water.flow direction was inferred using ground water elevation data. The,ground water <br /> at the site on 25 ,June 2001 was inferred to have been flowing to the north-northwest:under an <br /> average hydraulic.gradient of 0.009,feet/feet..Figure 4 illustrates the ground water elevation contours. <br /> `.3.2. ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES " <br />' <br /> TPH-g w detected in the water les collected from monitoring wells MW2 and MW5 at . <br /> . as d, samples <br /> conceritrations-of 120 micrograms per liter,(ug/l) and 95 µg/1,respectively.'TPH-d was not detected . <br /> '"at or.above laboratory''reporting limits in.the water samples. <br /> Qne or'more BTEX,compound's were detected in the.water-samples collected'from wells MW2, <br />'. 'MW5 and MW6 at'concentrations as ;high as- 12 µg/1 benzene, 0.59 µgll toluene,, 8' µg11, <br /> ethylbenzene and 4:3 µgh total xylenes. MTBE-was not detected at or-above laboratory,reporting s_ <br /> limits in the ground water samples: <br /> No analytes were detected at or above laboratory'reportirig limits in the water samples collected from <br /> domestic wells DW5157 and DW5055. ' <br /> 11 _Current and previous analytical results'are summarized on Table 2. The laboratory report (MAI Lab <br /> ID No. 68651; 68652 and.71062 through 71067), QA/QC report and chain-of-custody forrh are <br /> included,in' <br /> Appendix B. <br /> n . CONCI;USIONS <br /> 4.0. SUMMARY AND <br /> Based on the data collected during this monitoring period;AGE.concludes: <br /> On.. 25 June',.2001; the ground water at the' site was inferred .to be flowing .to the <br />' north-northwest under an average gradient of 0.009 feet/feet'. <br /> ..The. highest 'concentration',of dissolved hydrocarbons quantified as TPH=g and BTEX <br /> compounds;extends north.frorn USTs No:4 and 5.Dissolved hydrocarbons were encountered' <br />' in the down-gradient;direction from the former USTs in samples frorri monitoring wells <br /> MW2 and MW5: ,Dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations decreased in water <br /> samples from wells MW1, MW2, MW5 and'MW6: Dissoived•hydrocarbons decreased to, <br /> non-detectable concentrations in . wells MW1 and- MW6. ' Dissolved hydrocarbon ' <br /> concentrations remained,non-detectable in samples from wells MW3 and MW4. <br /> ` ddvunced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />