Laserfiche WebLink
f , <br /> Quarterly Report;= June 1999 <br /> STRONG PROPERTY <br /> 5157-West Business Loop 205 _ <br /> Tracy- California <br /> 1.0. INTRODUCTION <br /> Advanced, GeoEnvironmental, Inc..."(AGE)' has prepared,this Quarterly Report for- 5157 West <br /> Business Loop 205, Tracy;"California. The site setting is illustrated on Figure'1. Site st uctures'and <br />' monitoring•well 'locations are depicted-on.Figure 2. The objective of the work .was to rnonitor <br /> dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations. <br /> in ground water and to characterize ground water <br /> flow,dii-ection and, gradient on the site. This-report vis prepared_.in-accordance.with guidelines' <br />' established .by 'the San Joaquin County-Public Health Services- Environmental Health Division <br /> (PHS-EHD) and by the Ceritrai Valley, Regional,Water Quality Conti-ol Board,(C`JRWQCB)'fox'''' <br />' investigation of underground'storage tank (UST} site's. A'suminary of previous'investigations at the <br /> ..Site, was included in` Preliminar Evaluation And Investi ation Re a-t - " <br /> Y g p July 1998,' dated 14 <br /> September'1998, prepared by AGE. <br /> 2.0. . QUARTERLY MONITORING AND SAMPLING PROCEDURES <br /> On 14 June.1999., ground water monitoring and saripIing was performed.at the site on wells MW-1, ° <br /> MW-2; •MW-3 and MW-4. Ground water monitoring and sampling,procedures for the site were <br /> outlined in TVork Plan Addendum -June"1998,,dated 02 June 1998 prepared by AGE and approved <br /> by the PHS-EHD.by letter dated 08 June 1998. <br /> 2.1. MONITORING WELL PURGE PROCEDURES. <br /> epth to ground water was measured at each monitoring-well from the tops of the well casing's,at <br /> D <br /> the siie'to the nearest,0.01-foot utilizing a Solinsi waterlevel meter: Ground water elevations in each <br /> well at the;site were calculaied by subtracting•the measured.depth to ground 'ater from surveyed <br /> casing elevations(Table 1):.Ground water elevations were plotted and`contoured on a scaled site map <br /> (Figur`e 3) ' . <br /> After water level's we're measured,;approximately 8'gallons of,ground.water (a,minimum,ofthree . <br /> well-volumes per well) were removed from ixells M '-L MW-2, MW-3`and'IvlW=4 utilizing atwo= <br /> stage submersible pump; duringground water evacuation (purging);ground water,was pumped from ' <br /> near the top of each water'c6lbmi to facilitate removal of all stagnant water. Temperature, pH and <br /> I conductivity of purged water Nvere;measured for,stabilization at regular purge-volume intervals from <br /> each well using ;an,ICM Model,52200 water anafyzer. Field-data-,and logs are,included wiih' <br />.. . Append-1,x A. Purged ground «-ater wa's containerized in 55-gallon drums and was-stored on-site.in <br /> an area lacking general'public-access. = <br /> IAdiwncedCcoEn%ironmcntal,Inc. <br />