Laserfiche WebLink
. -r ..,ry- .,�, _ :r: ,...�:.. • : . �.... _: ,-..mow <br />'.. 23 April 1999 <br /> AGE-NC,Project No..98-0440 <br />'. Page 3 of 5 <br /> During the January 1999 monitoring event,depths to ground-water from wells MW4 through MW-4 <br />' and VW-1 ,were measured`between 27.81 and 28:69 feet below the tops of well casings. Ground <br /> water elevation at the site increased'an'average 1.94 feet between the October 1998 and the January <br /> 1999•ground water monitoring-events. The ground water elevation data for MW-i through MW-4 <br /> during the Janu 1999 round water monitoring event is depicted in Figure_ _ as3' g g p gore 3. <br /> Ground water monitoring data collectedin the area.of wells MW-1 through.MW-4 indicated that' the- <br /> ground <br /> "round water flow direction coon was generally toward the northwest at a gradient of.Q.01 ft/ft, or <br /> approximately 58 feet'per mile (Figure 3). <br /> 3.2. LABORATORY,RE9ULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> A total of four ground water samples-were submitted to a DHS-certified laboratory in January 1999. <br /> TPH-g was detected in a water sample collected from well MW-21 at a concentration of 2,700 <br />' micrograms per liter (,ug/I); however the laboratory•reported .unmodified or weakly modified <br /> gasoline in this sample was significant. TPH-d was detected in ground water samples collected from <br /> MW- and•MW-2 at concentrations as�high as 1,500'�g/l; however the laboratory reported that the <br /> diesel chromatograms for the samples did not have typical diesel characteristics. <br /> BTEX compounds were detected in ground water samples collected from wells MW-2-and MW-3 ' <br /> at concentrations ranging as high as 340 ,u <br /> g/l (benzene, MW-2). <br /> MTBE was not detected above laboratory reporting limits:for any of the analyzed,samples utilizing <br /> EPA Methods 8020 and 8260. No other fuel oxygenated additives were detected above laboratory <br /> reporting limits from the analyzed samples. <br /> Analytical results of the ground water samples are summarized in Table 2. The laboratory reports <br /> (McCampbell Analytical Inc. Lab I.D. 02301 through 02304) and chain-of-custody forms are <br /> r presented iri Appendix B: _ <br /> 4.0.• DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. <br /> Based upon data,collected during the January 1999 monitoring event, AGE concludes: <br /> • Ground water monitoring-data collectedin the area of wells MW-1'through MW-4 indicated <br /> that the ground water flow direction was generally toward the northwest at a gradient of 0.01 <br /> ! ft/ft, or approximately 58 feet per mile. Due to,the low gradient at the site, slight variations <br /> in ground water,measurements'or, changes of recharge/discharge of the local ground water <br /> Advanced GcoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />