My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000990
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
BUSINESS LOOP 205
>
5157
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544135
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2019 10:38:48 AM
Creation date
2/12/2019 10:13:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0000990
RECORD_ID
PR0544135
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005488
FACILITY_NAME
STRONG, RUTH
STREET_NUMBER
5157
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
BUSINESS LOOP 205
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
5157 W BUSINESS LOOP 205
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'29 ApriF2005 <br /> :le <br /> - AGE-NC Project Na. 98-0440 , <br /> Page 14 of.18 <br /> 7:1.2. Feasibility. Testing <br /> Aquifer testing has riot been performed at the'site; Site-specific testing would have to be performed <br /> prior to initiation of a pump and-treat"method.At the present time, ground water-is-approximately <br /> 13-to 14 feet bsg, within the sand layer located at the top of the water table or 10-feet bsg. <br /> There areseveral disadvantages to'pump and treat" methods, which include: 1)'extended cleanup . <br /> periods,resulting in increased total costs,although the maintenance for this method is relatively'cost <br /> effective and 2)regulatory cleanup goals are difficult to attain,mostly due to persistent hydrocarbons t <br /> detected dining subsequent sampling-events. <br /> 'This technology is.useful for. hydraulic control to prevent_spreading of the contaminant plume: <br /> Minimizing water disposal costs will significantly increase feasibility,of this method. <br />' 7.1.3. Duration ` <br /> ` Experience has shown that all systems involving ground water extraction require much more time ' <br /> liethan would be anticipated from aquifer tests and calculations of ground water discharge rates, and <br /> method ethod seldom achieves regulatory goals for ground water clean-up. Systems typically operate <br /> for several years.During this time,pumps and other equipment may need replacement several times. <br /> 7.1.4. Cost <br /> •Ground water extraction is usually a very costly method of ground water treatment. Costs for <br /> installation.of a."pump,and treat" systet h typically ranges from $_30,000 to $50,000, including the, <br /> installation of large-diameter extraction wells. Once-extracted, the contaminated:water must be <br /> treated 'or disposed. Treatment` is'highly dependant upon 'the concentrations of dissolved. <br /> hydrocarbons in the.ground water; the cost,per gallon.could be as.great,as $2 based.'on the = <br /> extraction/treatment of approximately,100,000 gallons of contaminated ground water. Costs for the . <br /> entire project would likely be'between $100, 000 and $300,000. <br /> 7.2. VIN-SITU BIOREMEDIATION/BIOENHANCEMENT ., , <br /> In-situ bioremediation involves the introduction 'of h drocarbon-degrading microbes and/or <br /> supplemental nutrients to enhance naturally-occurring or injected bacteria,`through wells into the <br /> ground water.The microbes degrade hydrocarbons and spread laterally(and vertically)by migration <br /> and reproduction. <br />�. Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.