Laserfiche WebLink
, <br /> 20 June 2001 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 98-0440 _ <br />' Page 5'of 6 <br /> Department,of Water Resources, the regional ground'water flow direction has been toward.the ; <br /> northeast. Rose diagrams showing ground water flow direction, flow' direction distribution and <br /> gradient for the eight monitoring;events conducted.at the site are illustrated on Figure 5. <br /> ,4:4. CONTAMINANT MIGRATION <br />' s f the 2001 monitoring event, analytical results from ground water samples indicate wells <br /> A o h g - <br /> MWI, MW2, MW5 and MW6 are impacted with petroleum'hydrocaibons, and'wells MW3 and . <br /> MW4 are not impacted. Soil samples collected during the UST removals in August 1989'indicated,, <br /> detected in soil samples collected beneath UST No. 4 and UST,No. 5. USTs No. <br /> TPH-.g was-'only p . <br /> 4 and 5,are located in the east"A on of the site (Figure 2);which'based on,soil sample analyses, is <br /> t the main contaminant source area on the site. Monitoring'well MW3 is located to the northwest of <br /> the main'.contaminant source area, which has been directly down-gradient three of the last eight <br /> monitoring events. However,"samples from MW3 have not contained detectable concentrations of- <br /> TPH-g or TPH-d for the.past eight sampling,events. AGE believes this may be due to the greater <br /> distance'ofMW3 frorn the main contaminant source area on the site compared to MW5 and MW6. <br /> . Proximity coupled with,a north-northeast ground water flow direction exhibited in the past may <br /> explain why wells MW2, MW5 and MW6 are impacted with petroleum hydrocarbons and well <br /> MW3 is not. Additionally, Sand Zone A and Sand Zorie B may provide-preferred migration routes <br /> fol impacted ground water when saturated- Further investigation is needed to determine the extent ; <br />' of the impacted ground water and the relationship-between the subsurface conditions and the plume <br /> 'migration path. <br /> 5.0. ' SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS = <br /> Based on the data collected during this,monitoring period, AGE concludes: <br /> • ` Depth to groundwater at the site as'of 15 March'2001.was approximately 1335 feet below <br />' surface grade with a north-northwesterly flow direction:. <br /> • The highest concentration.of dissolved hydrocarbons quantified as TPH-g, TPH-d, and <br />' generally BTEX compounds extends northeast from USTs No. 4 and 5. Dissolved <br /> hydrocarbons were encountered-in,the down-gradient`direction from the former USTs in <br /> Samplesfrom monitoring wells MW2, MW5 and MW6.- <br />' lateral extent of petroleum h drocaibon'impacted-grouiid,water has.not been defined <br /> The late p , - y . . <br /> toward the northeast beyond MW5 and MW6. The'hydrocarbori plume is fairly wedefined <br /> well dened ; <br /> to the south, east and west and northwest. <br /> Advanced GmEavironmental,Inc. <br />