Laserfiche WebLink
The borings were drilled using a truck-mounted CME 55 rig. The drill rig and two-man crew <br /> were supplied by Soils Exploration Services, Inc. of Benicia, California. During drilling, <br /> auger returns were monitored for the presence of organic vapors using a photo-ionization <br /> detector (PID: Thermo Environmental 580A, 10.0 eV, calibrated to isobutylene). Soil <br /> samples were collected ahead of the drill bit using a split-tube sampler loaded with three <br /> pre-cleaned 2-inch by 6-inch brass sleeves. The samples were collected at five-foot intervals, <br /> using a 140-pound hammer to advance the sampler 18 inches.The number of blows required <br /> to advance the sampler in 6-inch increments was recorded on the boring logs. To avoid <br /> cross-contamination, the sampling equipment was washed in an alconox solution and rinsed <br /> twice with water prior to each sampling run. <br /> For each sample, both ends of the lead tube were covered with aluminum sheets, capped <br /> and sealed with tape. The samples were then stored on ice and transported under chain-of- <br /> custody to McCampbell Analytical Inc. in Pacheco, California (MAI). <br /> 3.7 Logging <br /> Soil was extruded from the second brass tube and screened for the presence of organic <br /> vapors, using a PID, and the readings were recorded on the boring logs. The soil was then <br /> described in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (see Boring Logs, <br /> Appendix C). <br /> 3.8 Well Completion <br /> Borings MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3 were completed as groundwater monitoring wells using <br /> 2-inch diameter PVC casing with 0.020 inch screen from 20 to 5 feet. The filter pack (#3 <br /> Lonestar sand)was installed from 20 feet to 3.5 feet. A surge block was used to set:the sand <br /> pack. Bentonite chips were used to make a 1-foot plug and the wells were grouted to the <br /> surface with Portland cement. <br /> 3.9 Monitoring Well Purge Procedures <br /> On October 24, 1994, the water levels in monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2 and MIN-3 were <br /> measured relative to the top of the casing using a Solinst water level meter. The relative <br /> piezometric level in each well and hydraulic gradient were determined by subtracting the <br /> depth to groundwater from the relative casing elevation (Table 5). <br /> After water levels were measured, a 2-stage submersible purge pump was used to surge and <br /> purge each well. Between 7 and 9 gallons of water were removed from each well to stabilize <br /> temperature, pH and conductivity (Appendix E). Stabilization parameters were measured <br /> at one-gallon intervals using an ICM water analyzer. Pumping was then continued to develop <br /> the wells. Approximately 35 gallons of water were removed from MW-1 and approximately <br /> 20 gallons were removed from MW-2 and MW-3. The purge water was stored in 55-gallon <br /> drums on-site. <br /> 0-1bs d A.&S. kw,I- 9 <br /> CA{DWM...w/79lA-93 <br /> .J <br />