Laserfiche WebLink
Work Plan—Byron Road,Tracv,California <br /> June 16,2003 06-6102-00-2931-030 <br /> Page 8 <br /> TPHg and TPHd were detected in only one sample analyzed at a concentration of 720 and 520 gg/L, <br /> respectively. Concentrations of TPHd (140 µg/L) were also detected from a grab groundwater sample <br /> that was non-filtered. <br /> In September 1998, Geomatrix installed two monitoring wells (TW-1 and TW-2) to confirm detections of <br /> TPHd and TPHg in groundwater. The wells were installed at the approximate locations as the two <br /> borings that contained detections in grab groundwater samples collected from the July 1998 investigation. <br /> Monitoring well borings were advanced to a depth of 14 feet bgs and were screened from 4 to 14 feet bgs. <br /> Depth to groundwater during the sampling event was measured at seven feet bgs. Groundwater samples <br /> were collected from both wells, although one well (TW-2) was observed to have petroleum sheen at the <br /> time of sampling (a groundwater sample was collected at the request of the SJCPHS). Groundwater <br /> samples were analyzed for TPHg, TPHd, BTEX, and PAHs. A second round of groundwater sampling, <br /> with the same list of analytes, was conducted on October 16, 1998. Because of observed petroleum sheen <br /> in one well, no groundwater samples were collected on October 16, 1998. <br /> Petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected in one of the two wells sampled (TW-1) in September 1998. <br /> Based on the initial sampling of the well observed to have petroleum sheen, TPHg, TPHd, ethylbenzene, <br /> and xvienes were detected at 1,200, 520, 1.7, and 4.1 gg/L, respectively. Concentrations of <br /> acenaphthene, fluorene, and phenanthrene were also detected at 0.9, 2.2,and 1.4 gg/L,respectively. <br /> In July 1999, Geomatrix installed an additional well (TW-3) to assess groundwater quality north of the <br /> southern property boundary at the request of RWCQB. In a letter dated November 8, 1999, the RWQCB <br /> approved the destruction of well TW-2 due to the residence being built on top of the TW-2 location. The <br /> remaining two wells were sampled and monitored for four quarters. Groundwater samples were <br /> submitted for analyses of TPHg, TPHd with and without silica gel cleanup, BTEX, and PAHs. TPHg, <br /> BTEX, or PAHs have not been detected in the groundwater samples from either of the remaining wells. <br /> However, TPHd has been detected in both remaining wells prior to silica gel cleanup over the last four <br /> quarters of sampling. <br /> In August 2002, Geomatrix prepared a Health Risk Screening Evaluation (HRE). Exposure pathways <br /> considered included: inhalation of volatile organic chemicals from soil and groundwater, inhalation of <br /> airborne dust from soil; ingestion of soil and groundwater; and dermal contact with soil and groundwater. <br /> Geomatrix identified ingestion of groundwater as being the pathway associated with the highest risk. <br /> Based on the results of the HRE, Geomatrix concluded residual petroleum hydrocarbon constituents in <br /> soil or groundwater do not pose an unacceptable health risk to humans or other environmental receptors. <br /> In a letter dated February 28. 2003, the RWQCB had reviewed the HRE, but did not make a final <br /> determination concerning "no further action" until the Department of Toxics Substances Control (DTSC) <br /> has completed the review of the HRE and additional groundwater monitoring of the site wells was <br /> performed. The RWQCB requested a work plan be prepared proposing an additional quarter of <br /> groundwater sampling. <br /> In a letter dated May 5, 2003, the RWQCB approved the work plan submitted by SAIC to conduct an <br /> additional quarterly monitoring and sampling of the two remaining wells. The monitoring and sampling <br /> is scheduled for June 2003. <br /> K:CVX-OVP\RO W_SITES\westsidechannel\draftworkplan.doc <br />