Laserfiche WebLink
' Appendix B:Field, Sampling, and Analytical Methods <br /> B.4. SAMPLING LOCATIONS/SURVEY METHODS <br /> Soil borings were geo-spatially located using a global positioning system(GPS)unit. The GPS survey <br /> methods were consistent with SAIC FTP No. 175, "Field Measurement of Physical and Topographical <br /> Features." <br /> B.S. EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION <br /> ' The decontamination of sampling equipment, which did not directly contact the samples, was performed <br /> in accordance with SAIC FTP No.400, "Equipment Decontamination." Sample collection devices, <br /> which directly contacted the samples, were decontaminated in accordance with SAIC FTP No.405, <br /> ' "Cleaning and Decontaminating Sample Containers and Sampling Equipment." <br /> In general, all non-dedicated equipment that came into contact with potentially contaminated soil or <br /> groundwater was decontamintated. Decontamination occurred before and after each use of a piece of <br /> ' equipment. For example, the down-hole equipment was cleaned between borings,using a Liquinox/water <br /> solution to prevent the possibility of cross contamination. The equipment was decontaminated in a <br /> predesignated area on plastic sheeting, and the clean equipment was stored in an uncontaminated area. <br /> ' Specific decontamination procedures for non-dedicated sampling equipment vary by sampler type, and <br /> they are more fully described in SAIC FTP No. 405. Disposable equipment intended for one-time use <br /> was not decontaminted but was packaged for appropriate disposal. <br /> ' Reusable sampling equipment not coming into contact with potentially contaminated soil samples,but <br /> requiring decontamination, included field test meters;the water-level sounder; direct-push drilling rig <br /> cutting shoes, drive heads, piston asemblies, samplers,and other fittings; and stainless steel hand augers <br /> and trowels. Specific decontamination procedures employed for these types of sampling equipment are <br /> more fully described in SAIC FTP No.400. <br /> B.6. SAMPLE CUSTODY <br /> ' The integrity of environmental samples collected during this investigation was ensured, from collection to <br /> final dispostion, by documenting possession, in accordance with SAIC FTP No. 625, "Chain-of- <br /> Custody." The chain-of-custody record identified the contents of each shipment and maintained the <br /> ' custodial integrity of the samples. Generally, a sample was considered to be in a person's custody if it <br /> was in their physical possession or in their view, locked up, or kept in a secured area that was restricted to <br /> authorized personnel. The chain-of-custody record included the following: <br /> ' • Sample identification numbers; <br /> • Site name; <br /> • Sample date(s); <br /> • Numbers and volumes of sample containers; <br /> • Required analyses; <br /> • Signatures and names of samplers; <br /> • Signature of any individual(s) with custody over samples; <br /> • Airbill number; and <br /> • Note(s) indicating special holding time and/or detection limits. <br /> Every transfer of custody was noted and signed for on the record, a copy of which was kept by an <br /> individual who signed. The original records accompanied the sample shipment with a separate record for <br /> ' each cooler. A copy was made for the SAIC master files. <br /> B-2 <br /> From Science to Solutions <br />