Laserfiche WebLink
Chevron Pipeline Easement Environmental Assessment Report <br /> November 21,2001 <br /> Page 12 <br /> 5.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS <br /> Condor observed the excavation of 13 trenches and the advancement of 185 soil borings in the vicinity of <br /> Byron Road between the Alameda County line and Wicklund Road for the purpose of investigating the <br /> possible presence of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in the soil and groundwater. No soil <br /> contamination was observed in the 13 trenches. Visual soil contamination in the form of gray green to <br /> dark brown staining of the soil was observed in 20 soil borings. Visual contamination was initially <br /> detected at depths from 4.0 feet to 18.5 feet. Contamination was detected at a maximum depth of 46.5 <br /> feet. Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in soil samples from 18 of these 20 borings. Petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons were detected in an additional three soil samples that had no visible soil contamination. <br /> PNAs were detected in 17 of the 18 soil samples contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons that were <br /> analyzed for PNAs. A soil sample collected from soil boring GP152 at a depth of 6.5 feet contained the <br /> greatest concentration of PNAs in soil. <br /> Unfiltered groundwater samples were collected from 10 of the soil borings in which contaminated soil <br /> was observed and from the five soil borings in the alfalfa field southeast of the intersection of Mountain <br /> - House Parkway and Byron Road. Seven of the groundwater samples collected from the soil borings with <br /> visible contamination and one groundwater sample from a soil boring in the alfalfa field were selected <br /> for laboratory analysis. The other groundwater samples were not analyzed because of their proximity to <br /> - the samples selected for analysis. Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in the seven groundwater <br /> samples collected from soil borings with contaminated soil. No petroleum hydrocarbons were detected <br /> at or above the laboratory practical quantitation limits in the groundwater sample collected from the <br /> - _ alfalfa field. PNAs were detected in all groundwater samples contaminated with petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons. Benzo (k) fluoranthene, dibenzo (a,h) anthracene, and indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene were not <br /> detected at or above the laboratory practical quantitation limit in any of the groundwater samples. The <br /> remaining PNAs were detected in at least one groundwater sample contaminated with petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons. <br /> Soil and groundwater contamination by petroleum hydrocarbons in the vicinity of the historical Chevron <br /> crude oil pipeline in the areas investigated by Condor between the Alameda County line and Wicklund <br /> Road is intermittent along the alignment. Excavations below four feet in the right-of-way along the <br /> south side of Byron Road may encounter petroleum product in the soil, particularly in the locations <br /> where this investigation detected contamination. The contaminated soil is usually easy to visually <br /> identify by the gray green to dark brown stain and by the petroleum hydrocarbon odor that accompanies <br /> the staining. <br /> The presence of free product in some of the groundwater samples suggests floating product may be <br /> present in the aquifer at those sample locations. Dewatering along the south side of Byron Road will <br /> likely result in removing water containing petroleum hydrocarbons in solution, as floating product, <br /> and/or adsorbed to suspended sediment. <br /> 6.0 LIMITATIONS <br /> The stated purpose of this investigation was to determine if petroleum hydrocarbon contamination was in <br /> -- the soil, and subsequently to evaluate the potential impact on construction activities of detected <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons in the soil and groundwater. No other use of the results of this investigation is <br /> intended. Condor developed the interpretations and conclusions presented herein in accordance with <br /> generally accepted principles and practice. Conclusions presented in this report are professional opinions <br /> based on limited information obtained at the time of our site visits. Condor has endeavored to determine <br /> i«1 <br /> CONDOR <br />