Laserfiche WebLink
FOOTS IILL <br /> .1 2793 PADDY CREEK LANE L LL<DD CA 9-9240 <br /> • hr111: 47 _ <br /> PH, (209) 36$-9381 FAX (209) 367-1163 <br /> Ms. Carol Oz October 25, 1999 <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> P. O. Box 388 <br /> Stockton, CA 95201 <br /> Site Code 9 038 <br /> Subject: Michael D. & Sharon Olivarez, 300 S. California St. Stockton, Ca. <br /> Monitoring Well Information and Results of Sample Analytical Testing of 7/19'90) <br /> Dear Ms. Oz: <br /> On 7119199, Del Tech Geotechnical Support Services secured water samples. from the monitoring <br /> wells on the above stated property. The work was supervised by Foothill Engineering. :ill <br /> monitoring wells were in good condition and samples were taken using the standard recomnlen:led <br /> procedures. All samples were extracted using the tube with check valve pump system. Pui-_Lc: <br /> volumes and the physical properties of the ground water are attached in the Del-Tech held log <br /> All samples were transported under chain of custody to Sherwood Labs of Hilmar, Cal ifornin for <br /> analysis by EPA methods 602 and 5030/8015 . Samples from each monitoring well were tra:-v po rte-d <br />. from Sherwood Labs to Entech Analytical Labs, Inc. for oxygenate analysis, EPA method 8260V <br /> under chain of custody.All water sample analysis and groundwater elevations are summarized, in;IN,attached tabular form with original data also attached. <br /> FINDINGS <br /> The groundwater elevation in all of the wells has risen +/- 1.5' from the last samplil-!2 dL11 V <br /> (12/29/98). The direction of groundwater flow is to the Northeast (see attached map). r,41h'-1 and <br /> MW-2 were analyzed to have highest concentration of gasoline contamination at 71700 pph. ti9 and MW-3 produced groundwater samples with lower levels of TPHg than previous sample,; from <br /> the same well. MW-2 produced samples of higher concentrations of TPHg. <br /> All monitoring wells showed higher groundwater elevations than previously recon-Jed. `rhe <br /> groundwater hydraulic gradient was calculated at S=0.004 with the slope in the Northeasl dir:ctlOtl. <br /> New monitoring wells MW-IR, MW-2R, and MW-3R were sampled and analyzed as replaoir'enl <br /> wells for MW-1,MW-2,and MW-3 that have water elevations that produce over screen con.11i.:».s. <br /> The sampling of all monitoring wells on the site was done for comparison. <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> The groundwater elevation in all of the wells is approximately 1.5 feet higher than last sampled. The <br /> raise in groundwater in the calender year of 1999 is typical of all areas in the City of Snocklon. <br /> Up gradient monitoring well MW-3 has produced samples with lower concentrations of Ti,i-i c than <br /> 1 <br />