Laserfiche WebLink
FOOTHILL <br /> ENGINEERING <br /> 12793 PADDY CREEK LANE LODI, CA 95240 <br /> PH. (209) 368-9381 FAX (204) 367-1163 <br /> Mr. Ronald Rowe January 25, 1999 <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> P. O. Box 388 <br /> Stockton, CA 95201 <br /> Site Code #1038 <br /> Subject: Michael D. & Sharon Olivarez, 300 S. California St. Stockton, Ca. <br /> Monitoring Well Information and Results of Sample Analytical Testing <br /> Dear Mr. Rowe: <br /> On 12/29/98,Del Tech Geotechnical Support Services secured water samples from the monitoring <br /> wells on the above stated property. The work was supervised by Foothill Engineering. All <br /> monitoring wells were in good condition and samples were taken using the standard recommended <br /> procedures. All samples were taken with a 1" stainless steel bailer after purging each well. Purge <br /> volumes and the physical properties of the ground water are attached in the Del-Tech field log. <br /> All samples were transported under chain of custody to Sherwood Labs of Hilmar, California. <br /> Samples from each monitoring well were transported from Sherwood Labs to BSK Laboratories for <br /> oxygenate analysis under chain of custody. All water sample analysis and groundwater elevations <br /> are summarized in the attached tabular form. <br /> FINDINGS <br /> The groundwater elevation in all of the wells has risen more than seven feet from the January 24, <br /> 1997 sampling date. The direction of groundwater flow is to the Northeast. MW-1 was analyzed to <br /> have highest concentration of gasoline contamination at 197,000 ppb. . MW-2 and MW-3 produced <br /> groundwater samples with lower levels of TPHg than previous samples from the same well. <br /> All monitoring wells showed higher groundwater elevations than previously recorded. The <br /> groundwater hydraulic gradient was calculated at S=0.004 with the slope in the Northeast direction. <br /> No free gasoline product or gasoline sheen was found in any of the groundwater samples. This was <br /> .:most likely due to the over screen condition that exists in all of the monitoring wells. <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> The groundwater elevation in all of the wells is approximately seven feet higher than last sampled. <br /> The raise in groundwater the calender year of 1998 is typical of all areas in the City of Stockton. All <br /> of the-monitoring wells have groundwater levels above the top of the monitoring well screens. This <br /> =may produce a sample condition that is not typical at the ground water surface.- <br /> All <br /> urface:All up gradient monitoring wells (MW-2 & MW-3) have produced samples with lower <br /> concentrations of TPHg than previously tested. The down gradient monitoring well (MW-1) has a <br /> higher concentration of TPHg than previously tested. <br />