Laserfiche WebLink
CLEARWATER <br /> G R O U P, I iy C. <br />' Number of Extraction Wells Required <br /> Once an approximate permeability value has been obtained and is consistent with <br /> I known subsurface lithology, the feasibility of reducing hydrocarbon contamination <br /> through vapor extraction in a reasonable period of time (<5 years) can be estimated <br /> using the model presented by P.C. Johnson, et al (1990). This model is based on the <br /> I maximum contaminant vapor concentrations in extracted' vapors, residual soil <br /> contaminant composition, vapor pressure, assumed soil temperature and the ideal <br /> gas law and will be determined with the aid of the computer program called <br /> "HyperVentilate®" (Johnson, 1992). The number of vapor extraction wells needed <br /> to remediate the contaminated soil within five years will be determined from the <br /> results of the pilot test-and the feasibility calculations and is approximately equal to <br /> the estimated area of contamination divided by the area of influence of one well. <br /> All calculations performed in the computer program or performed by hand and any <br /> assumptions used will be presented for review with the data and pilot test results. <br /> IIn addition to estimating the minimum required number of extraction wells using <br /> the radius of influence, the required number of wells will also be determined based <br /> on the required volume of air needed to achieve remediation through <br /> PP volatilization in a given length of time (TR). This calculation presented by Johnson <br /> & Ettinger (1993) determines the number of wells required (N,) based on estimated <br /> saturated hydrocarbon vapor concentrations (1/a), an estimated mass of <br /> contaminant to be removed (Mcont), and feasible single well flow rate (Qweli - <br /> determined from the step tests): <br /> Nw = (a Mcont) / (Qwell TA) <br />' The two estimates, determined using the radius of influence and using the above- <br /> referenced equation, have inherent limitations and sources of error. However, the <br /> results will be compared to estimate a reasonable number of vapor extraction wells <br /> Iand well spacing. Placement of the additional vapor extraction wells, if required, <br /> will depend on the location of existing utilities, buildings, and other site constraints. <br /> Flows and vacuums may need to be modified to ensure complete coverage of the <br /> Iarea to be remediated. It must be recognized that the pilot tests and calculations are <br /> performed to provide a basis for the system design. The actual system configuration <br /> may be modified from the design based on continual evaluation of operating data <br /> once the system is installed. On-going system evaluation will be an important part <br /> of the remedial action. <br /> 6 <br /> I <br /> Soil Vapor Extraction Test Protocols Page 4 of 5 December 16,1994 <br />