My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CALIFORNIA
>
602
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544148
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2019 5:03:31 PM
Creation date
2/14/2019 2:54:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0544148
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0005937
FACILITY_NAME
NEAL STALLWORTH AUTO DETAIL
STREET_NUMBER
602
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
CALIFORNIA
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13916509
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
602 N CALIFORNIA ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
206
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
N <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department DIRECTOR <br /> Donna Heran, REHS <br /> 600 East Main Street <br /> Stockton , California 95202 -3029 PROGRAM COORDINATORS <br /> i_ufu� Robert McClellon, REHS <br /> — Jeff Carruesco, REHS, RDI <br /> O �P Kasey Foley, REHS <br /> 4 FoR Website: ww09)468. 3420 d Linda Turkatte, REHS <br /> Phone: (209) 468-3420 <br /> Fax : (209) 464-0138 <br /> December 15 , 2011 <br /> Gary Stallworth <br /> 602 California Street <br /> Stockton , CA 95202 <br /> Subject: Stallworth Auto Sales <br /> 602 California Street <br /> Stockton , CA 95202 <br /> The San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD ) has reviewed Ground <br /> Water Remediation Feasibility Study Work Plan (Study) dated October 31 , 20113 <br /> submitted on your behalf by Advanced Geo Environmental , Inc. (AGE ) and has the <br /> following comments. <br /> I <br /> In the Study AGE discusses four remedial options for addressing the petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon contamination persistent in the groundwater and saturated soil at this site . <br /> The options discussed were in-situ chemical oxidation (ISCO ) , enhanced aerobic bio- <br /> remediation , air sparging and oxygen release compound advanced (ORC-advanced ) . <br /> AGE did not compare the listed options for cost, except to state in general terms that <br /> some processes would take longer and therefore cost more. <br /> AGE recommends conducting a 4-week pilot test utilizing a form of ISCO called Fenton 's <br /> Reagent, going on to say they will utilize in the pilot test " . . . a solution of 5% hydrogen <br /> peroxide (possibly with ferrous sulfate ) and an optimum pH (3-5) adjustor, using muriatic <br /> or sulfuric acid ( 1 % acid )" . AGE proposes injecting the Fenton 's Reagent into onsite wells <br /> MW-1A and MW-8 and utilizing onsite , downgradient wells MW-6 and MW-7 as <br /> compliance wells. Baseline sampling of these four wells is proposed to be done prior to <br /> the injection ; additional sampling to be done following the second weekly injection and <br /> following the fourth weekly injection . <br /> AGE further describes that a mixture of approximately 800 gallons of a 5% hydrogen <br /> peroxide solution , in which they have mixed one liter of muriatic acid , will be injected into <br /> wells MW- 1A and MW-8 per weekly injection event. No mention is made of when , or if, the <br /> ferrous sulfate will be added , though Fenton 's Reagent is , by definition , a solution of <br /> hydrogen peroxide and iron catalyst, and the function of pH adjustment by acid is to <br /> maintain solubility of the iron activator. <br /> Per the Interstate Technology Regulatory Council ( ITRC) Technical and Regulatory <br /> Guidance for In Situ Chemical Oxidation of Contaminated Soil and Groundwater, second <br /> edition January 2005 (Guidance Document) , many factors must be addressed when <br /> planning an ISCO injection , including : delivery method , reaction rates , temperature , pH , <br /> concentration of the reactants , stoichiometry of the reactions , catalysts , reaction by- <br /> products and system impurities (e .g . , natural organic matter, oxidant scavengers , etc . ) . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.