Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />' 08 November 2005 <br /> . AGE-NC Project No. 98-0481 <br />' Page 6 of 8 <br /> 4.1. EXTENT OF HYDROCARBON-IMPACTED SOIL <br />' Based on soil sample analytical results,relatively Iow levels of petroleum hydrocarbons were report <br /> directly beneath the former dispensers and associated product piping. Results from soil samples <br /> fcollected during the UST removal activities indicated detections of petroleum hydrocarbons at 4 and <br /> 8 feet bsg in the former dispenser area. Subsequently,results from soil boring B-I g,located between <br /> the two former dispenser locations, indicate that petroleum impacts from the dispensers did not <br />' extend to a depth of 9.5 feet bsg. No indications of hydrocarbon impact to soil were observed or <br /> reported for soils encountered in soil borings SB-1, SB-3, SB-4, or B-1, located around the former <br /> fuel dispenser island. However, the rupture of the active gasoline product line during the drilling <br /> of boring SB-2 resulted in reported detections of petroleum hydrocarbons extending to 7.5 feet bsg <br /> at the HA-1 location. The extent of petroleum hydrocarbon impact directly below the spill site was <br />' not assessed; however, soil samples subsequently collected from borings (SB-3 and SB-4), located <br /> within 8 and 12 feet of the spill site, had no reported detections of petroleum hydrocarbons, which <br /> indicates that impacts did not migrate significantly vertically or lateral from the spill site. As shown <br /> on Figures 6, 7, and 8, the extent of petroleum hydrocarbon-impacts to soil do not appear to extent <br /> beyond the immediate vicinity of the fuel dispenser island. <br /> . The amount of TPH-g in soil,based on the estimated lateral and vertical extent of the TPH-g plume <br /> (Figures 4 and 7), was calculated to be approximately 6.28 lbs, or approximately 1.0 gallon <br /> (Appendix Q. The amount of gasoline released from the line rupture was estimated to be between <br /> 3.7 and 6.9 gallons;however,a portion of that would have evaporated during the several days needed <br /> to repair the product line and re-pave the area. <br />' 4.2. EXTENT OF HYDROCARBON-IMPACTED GROUND WATER <br />' Ground water was encountered at approximately 59 feet bsg.Laboratory analysis of the grab ground <br /> water sample (SB4-H20) collected from boring SB-4, located approximately 12 feet northwest of <br /> the former dispenser island and spill site reported no detections of petroleum hydrocarbons. As <br /> shown on Figure 4, an apparently thick layer of fine-grained material exists below the initial 25 feet <br /> of interbedded silt and sands. Therefore, it appears that the relatively thick layer of fine-grained <br /> material is a sufficient barrier preventing the vertical migration of petroleum hydrocarbons to ground <br /> water beneath the dispenser location. <br />' According to the findings of an AGE sensitive receptor survey(Appendix A), conducted between <br /> October and November 2005, the closest potential receptor is a municipal well (Identified as <br /> municipal well#1) located at the end of Roosevelt Street, approximately 1,700 feet southeast from <br /> the site. Due to the significant distance between the site and the municipal well, the minor <br /> petroleum-hydrocarbon impacts to soil, and lack of impact to ground water, there does not appear <br /> • to be a significant concern regarding the location of the well.No other receptors noted in the survey <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc.. <br />