Laserfiche WebLink
r. <br /> r) <br /> Vogue Cleaners page 2 <br /> 2315 N. California Street June 23, 2008 <br /> Stockton, CA 95205 <br /> The installation of two ground water extraction (GWE) wells may be an effective <br /> remedial alternative but without a cost-effectiveness and feasibility evaluation comparing <br /> at least two remedial alternatives [CCR, Title 23, Chapter 16, 2725(f)(2)], the EHD <br /> cannot approve the recommendation. <br /> Please submit a feasibility study that includes a cost-effectiveness evaluation for at least <br /> two remedial alternatives that could restore the ground water to pre-release conditions. <br /> If it can be shown that GWE is the most cost-effective and feasible alternative at <br /> controlling the offsite migration of DCA, the EHD can approve a work plan to test the <br /> action. <br /> .The EHD approved skipping the second quartersampling/reporting event in electronic <br /> mail with Mr. Vlach. The request to modify this site's requirement to sample and report <br /> was addressed in EHD's October 5, 2007 letter. he frequency requirements that were <br /> established in this correspondence are to remain as listed. <br /> If you have any questions, please contact Michael Infurna, Senior Registered <br /> Environmental Health Specialist, at (209) 468-3454 or Nuel Henderson, Engineering <br /> Geologist, at (209) 468-3436. <br /> Sincerel <br /> Michael J. Infurna Jr., REHS Nuel C. Henderson Jr., PG <br /> Senior Registered Environmental Health Specialist Engineering Geologist <br /> Ml/nh <br /> c: Mr. James L. Barton, CVRWQCB - 11020 Sin Center Dr., #200 Rancho Cordova, <br /> CA 95670-6114 <br /> Mr. Mark Owens, SWRCB-Clean Up Fund ( UF) - PO Box 944212 Sacramento, <br /> CA 94244-2120 <br /> Mr. Michael Vlach, Foothill Engineering — 8442 Story Ridge Way, Antelope, CA <br /> 95843 1 <br />