Laserfiche WebLink
ENVIRO ,-MENTAL H ALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> u"v ° SAN JOAQU N COUNTY <br /> �G Supervisors <br /> Donna K.Heran,R.E.H.S. Unit Su P <br /> 304 East Weber A enue, Third Floor Carl Borgman,R.E.H.S. <br /> Director Mike Huggins,R.E.H.S.,R.D.I. <br /> •'. +'• Al Olsen,R.E.H.S. Stockton, Califoi nia 95202-2708 Douglas W.Wilson,R.E.H.S. <br /> Program Manager Telephone: ( 09) 468-3420 Margaret Lagorio,R.E.H.S. <br /> �! da Laurie A.Cotulla,R.E.H.S. <br /> Program Manager Fax: (209 464-0138 Robert McClellon,R.E.H.S. <br /> Mark Barcellos,R.E.H.S. <br /> R6-t <br /> HELEN HIGGINS SEP 16 200 ' <br /> i <br /> 5815 MORGAN PL <br /> i <br /> STOCKTON CA 95219 I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> RE: Vogue Cleaners RO#:0607 <br /> 2315 N. California St. CUF Claim #:011775 <br /> Stockton, CA., 95204 <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD) has reviewed <br /> Work Plan for CPT#1, #2, and #3 dated August 6, 2005 submitted by your <br /> consultant, Foothill Engineer (FE) and has the following comments. <br /> Although EHD approves the need for the CPT,,;, we would recommend that the <br /> proposed locations for CPT-1 and CPT-2 be placed closer to existing MW-5 and <br /> MW-2 if possible. <br /> EHD cannot guarantee that the installation of PT-3 will meet EHD criteria in <br /> regard to concerns with replacing MW-1. It is rare that a ground water grab <br /> sample would be a suitable replacement fora monitoring well, but EHD will <br /> evaluate the technical arguments, based on data and site conceptual model, put <br /> forward by your consultant on this issue. <br /> Recent documents submitted on your behalf contain the statement that "the <br /> Underground Storage Tank Clean Up Fund, Technical Review recommended <br /> that the investigation at Vogue Cleaners be closed" The only document EHD <br /> can find related to this statement is on the Pay ent Summary Sheet for claim <br /> No. 11775, dated 10/14/2004, wherein the Clean Up Fund (CUF) personnel <br /> included the statement "Check with regulatory agency for possible site closure." <br /> EHD has a direct verbal confirmation from the OF that their statement was only <br /> a suggestion to investigate the possibility for cl sure, and was not a technical <br /> recommendation. EHD requests that this misleading statement be dropped from <br /> future documents. <br /> The work plan is adequate and necessary [H 8 C. 25296.1 0(c)(3).] and <br /> approved. <br /> Please submit a Well Permit Application Form and $368 fee per parcel. <br />