My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CALIFORNIA
>
2315
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544152
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2019 8:10:59 PM
Creation date
2/14/2019 4:41:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0544152
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004062
FACILITY_NAME
VOGUE CLEANERS
STREET_NUMBER
2315
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
CALIFORNIA
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
12538016
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2315 N CALIFORNIA ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
334
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
f <br /> I <br /> �f 1 <br /> I <br /> Helen Higgins -2- MAY <br /> Claim No. 11775 5 2005 <br /> i <br /> Finally,I concur with Fund staff that the primary object ve of the ongoing monitoring and <br /> investigation at your site is to evaluate the presence and extent of chlorinated solvent <br /> contamination at your site. Petroleum contamination is ssentially only detectable in one out of t <br /> nine monitoring wells at your site. In addition,it is que tionable if the petroleum contamination <br /> in this monitoring well is even related to your site since it is located approximately 120 feet <br /> upgradient/side gradient to the former UST that allegedly contained gasoline. <br /> In conclusion,I find that the cost for the analysis of chlorinated solvents by EPA Method 601 <br /> remain ineligible for reimbursement from the Fund. In addition, because the primary objective <br /> of the ongoing monitoring and investigation at your site is to evaluate the presence and extent of <br /> chlorinated solvent contamination at your site,I find only 15% of a future monitoring and <br /> reporting labor and only the cost for laboratory analysis of petroleum hydrocarbons will be <br /> reimbursed by the Fund. <br /> This represents a Fund Manager Decision. If you are not in agreement with the above decision, <br /> you may request a Final Division Decision by the Chief of the Division within 60 days of the j <br /> date of this letter. If you do not request a Final Division Decision within those 60 days,this <br /> decision will become final and conclusive. The request should be sent to. <br /> Barbara L. Evoy, Chief USTCF Claim # 11775 <br /> Division of Financial Assistance <br /> State Water Resources Control Board <br /> P.O.Box 944212 <br /> Sacramento, CA 94344-2120 <br /> The request to the Chief of the Division must include, at a minimum: (1) A statement describing <br /> how the claimant is damaged by the prior staff decision. (2)A description of the remedy or <br /> outcome desired. (3)An explanation and supporting documentation of why the claimant <br /> believes the action or the decision is erroneous, inapprof nate or improper. <br /> If you have any questions regarding this letter,please telephone Mr. Bob Trommer at <br /> (916) 341-5684. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> i <br /> Ronald M. Duff,P.E., Manager ' <br /> UST Cleanup Fund <br /> CC: Mr. Michael Infema Mr. Michael Vlach <br /> San Joaquin County Foothills Engineering <br /> Dept. of Environmental Health 12793 Paddy Creelc Lane <br /> P.O. Box 388 Lodi, CA 95240 <br /> Stockton,CA 95201-0388 <br /> California Environmental Prot edon Agency <br /> %'o Recycled Pepe, <br /> £001A aX1K'HDH'1A £6506ZL9T6 XVJ 99:£T 5002/6T/50 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.