My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000866
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CALIFORNIA
>
2315
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544152
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000866
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2019 7:55:38 PM
Creation date
2/14/2019 4:49:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0000866
RECORD_ID
PR0544152
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004062
FACILITY_NAME
VOGUE CLEANERS
STREET_NUMBER
2315
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
CALIFORNIA
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
12538016
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2315 N CALIFORNIA ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FOOTHILL <br /> ENOINEERINO <br /> 12793 PADDY CREEK LANE LOD1 CA 95240 <br /> PH (209) 368-9381 FAX (209) 367-1163 <br /> Mr Michael Infurna <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services October 21, 1998 <br /> 10/21/98 <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> P O Box 388 <br /> Stockton, CA 95201 <br /> Subject Norman Higgins A K A Vogue Cleaners <br /> 2315 N California Street <br /> Stockton, CA Site code 231032 <br /> Dear Mr Infurna, <br /> Please find enclosed the revised "Report of Findings for Phase 2 Site Investigation" for Vogue <br /> Cleaners The reporting units for BTEX soil samples has been changed to mg/Kg as you <br /> requested Please also find a copy of a letter to Entech Labs from Cal/EPA that states both EPA <br /> Method 8240 and 8260 are acceptable for oxygenates In talking with Dr Simmons, he stated <br /> that for lab certification both methods were acceptable, but that 8260 was as easier method to use <br /> and most labs were switching to 8260 <br /> If you have any questions on these methods please call Dr Simmons at 5101540-3003 and be <br /> prepared to get a full explanation of the differences <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> Foothill Engineering <br /> J <br /> Ervin Rife urg <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.