Laserfiche WebLink
nr- <br /> 30 April 2005 <br /> . AGE-NC Project No 96-0232 <br /> Page 3 of 9 <br /> bottles without a preservative and into 40-m1 EPA-approved volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials <br /> containing 0 5 ml 18% hydrochloric acid as a sample preservative Care was taken to ensure that <br /> visible air bubbles were not present in the vials after filling and capping Ground water sample <br /> containers were labeled with the well designation, date, time, and sampler's initials <br /> 2 3 LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> Each ground water sample was logged on a chain of custody form,placed in a chilled container and <br /> transported to a California DHS-certified laboratory for analysis for <br /> • TPH-g and TPH-d by EPA Methods 50301318015Cm and 3510C/8015C, respectively, <br /> • Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX) by EPA Method 8260, <br /> • Tertiary butanol (TBA), di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tert butyl ether (ETBE),tert amyl <br /> methyl ether (TAME) and methyl-tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), Methanol and Ethanol by <br /> EPA Method 8260B <br /> a <br /> 24 FINDINGS <br /> Ground water elevation, flow direction and gradient were determined from field data collected on <br /> 28 March 2005, the contaminant impact to ground water was quantified by laboratory analysis of <br /> water samples collected on 28 and 29 March 2005 <br /> 2 4 1 Ground Water Elevation and Gradient <br /> The depths to ground water were measured at between 8 34 feet(MW-18)and 12 64 feet(MW-9C) <br /> below the tops of the well casings on 28 March 2005, ground water elevations were calculated to be <br /> between 0 82 feet (MW-20B) and 3 24 feet (MW-5) above mean sea level (MSL) <br /> Ground water elevation data collected from Flag City Chevron wells MW-9 (A-C),MW-11 (A-D), <br /> MW-13 (A-D), MW-16, MW-17, MW-18 and Three B's Truck Plaza wells MW-6, MW-9 (A-E) <br /> and MW-10 (A-F) on 28 March 2005 is depicted on cross section C-C' (Figure 3), by determining <br /> the difference between ground water elevations (dh) and dividing by the difference of the screen <br /> interval midpoints (dl), the vertical gradient between adjacent screen intervals was calculated <br /> Generally, near neutral vertical gradients were observed between the First Zone, Second Zone, <br /> Rocky's Upper Zone and Secondary Aquifer Zone, pronounced downward vertical gradients were <br /> • observed between Secondary Aquifer Zone and Primary Aquifer Zone (Figure 3) <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />