My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000686
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CAPITOL
>
6421
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0522496
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000686
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2019 7:29:01 PM
Creation date
2/15/2019 4:04:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0000686
RECORD_ID
PR0522496
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0015317
FACILITY_NAME
FLAG CITY CHEVRON
STREET_NUMBER
6421
STREET_NAME
CAPITOL
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
LODI
Zip
95245
APN
05532024
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
6421 CAPITOL AVE
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
216
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
09 May 2002 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 96-0232 <br /> Page 9of18 <br /> 4 2 GROUND WATER SAMPLING <br /> Ground water samples were collected from the purged wells MW-1 through MW-7 and EW-3 <br /> utilizing new,2-inch diameter disposable polyethylene bailers,ground water samples were collected <br /> from the purged wells MW-8 through MW-13 utilizing '/4-inch diameter polyethylene tubing <br /> Ground water samples were transferred into one-liter amber bottles without a preservative and into <br /> 40-m1 EPA-approved VOA vials containing 0 5 ml 18%hydrochloric acid as a sample preservative <br /> Care was taken to ensure that visible air bubbles were not present in the vials after filling and <br /> capping Ground water sample containers were labeled with the well designation, date, time, and <br /> sampler's initials <br /> Ground water sample collection from municipal water wells CSA-1,CSA-2 and domestic water well <br /> DW-1 was achieved by opening a valve from each water well outlet sample port and allowing each <br /> well pump to turn on and operate for a minimum of 15 minutes to purge the wells and then collecting <br /> the running water directly Into the sample containers <br /> Ground water samples were collected at sampling ports located near the tops of extraction wells <br /> EW-2, EW-4, EW-5, EW-6, EW-7, EW-8, EW-9 and EW-10, each extraction well was allowed to <br /> be operational for at least 30 minutes prior to collecting samples directly into the sample containers <br /> 43 LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> Each ground water sample was Iogged on a chain-of-custody form,placed in a chilled container and <br /> transported to a California Department of Health Services (DHS)-certified laboratory for analysis <br /> for <br /> • TPH-g, TPH-d and TPH-mo by EPA Methods 5030/8015 Modified and 3550/8015 <br /> Modified, respectively, <br /> • BTEX and MTBE by EPA Method 8020, and <br /> • Methanol,ethanol, 1,2-DCA,EDB,TBA,DIPE,ETRE,TAME and MTBE by EPA Method <br /> 8260 Modified <br /> 44 FINDINGS <br /> Ground water elevation, flow direction and gradient were determined from field data collected on <br /> 26 March 2002, the contaminant impact to ground water was quantified by laboratory analysis of <br /> water samples collected on 27 and 28 March 2002 <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.