My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000690
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CAPITOL
>
6421
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0522496
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000690
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2019 10:42:20 PM
Creation date
2/15/2019 4:10:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0000690
RECORD_ID
PR0522496
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0015317
FACILITY_NAME
FLAG CITY CHEVRON
STREET_NUMBER
6421
STREET_NAME
CAPITOL
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
LODI
Zip
95245
APN
05532024
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
6421 CAPITOL AVE
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
196
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
19 June 2000 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 96-0232 <br /> Page 20 of 35 <br /> 814 Feasibility <br /> Based on depth to ground water measurements collected at the site between July 1996 and May 2000 <br /> (Table 5), ground water levels have fluctuated anywhere between 3 and 15 feet bsg, therefore, the <br /> majority of adsorbed petroleum-impact is submerged beneath the water table <br /> Based on review of boring logs (Appendix A) generated during site investigation activities and <br /> geotechnical analysis of three shallow soil samples(Appendix D), soil beneath the former UST area <br /> has a relatively high silty sand, sandy silt and sandy clay content in the upper thirty-five feet, <br /> potentially making SVE an ineffective remedial method in the vadose zone <br /> Another negative aspect of SVE is that not all contaminated zones of soil are remediated effectively <br /> or at the same rate For example, a sandy soil zone will cleanup more quickly than a silty one SVE <br /> is not usually effective in soil with high clay content Other drawbacks of SVE include ineffective <br /> treatment of soil lying below ground water or within the capillary fringe or "smear" zone and <br /> ineffective treatment of longer-chain hydrocarbons Ground water remediation may have to be <br /> conducted concurrently with SVE to facilitate remediation of the smear zone <br /> 815 Duration <br /> Cleanup penods for soil vapor extraction typically range from several months to several years Based <br /> upon the volume of impacted soil at the site(estimated 3,337 cubic yards) and the likelihood that in- <br /> situ air sparging would be required assist in mechanically stripping submerged adsorbed <br /> hydrocarbons to finer-grained soils(silty sands,sandy silts and sandy clays),a 36 to 48 month period <br /> is estimated for the duration of remediation <br /> 8 16 Estimated Cost Of Soil Vapor Extraction <br /> The costs for installation,operation and general maintenance of SVE systems vanes,depending upon <br /> the particular system utilized for destruction of the extracted hydrocarbon vapors (then-nal <br /> destruction,carbon adsorption, etc ) and the established cleanup goals Installation of SVE wells at <br /> the site could cost between $20,000 and $30,000 The total cost to operate, sustain, monitor and <br /> sample an SVE system at this site could vary between $40,000 00 and $50,000 00 per year Based <br /> on the estimated 36 to 48 month period of remediation, total cost for SVE should range between <br /> $140,000 and $230,000 00 and does not include remediation of ground water <br /> Advanced GeoEn%tronmcntal,Inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.