Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> r-~ r <br /> i <br /> i r " <br /> 01 May 2000 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 96-0232 � <br /> Page 8 of I 1 <br /> Ir 5 4 2 LABORATORY RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> During the March 2000 sampling event, TPH-g and TPH-d were not detected in any of the analyzed <br /> Iground water samples <br /> BTEX compounds were detected in water samples collected from v�ells MW-1,MW-2, Mu'-6A and <br /> MW-6B at concentr atrons as high as 2 3 µgll and in the storm drain grab water sample at T <br /> concentiatzons as high as 11 �,g/1 <br /> IMTBE was detected in ground water samples collected from wells MVI -1, MW-2, MW-4, MW-6A, <br /> MW-613 and- MW-7 at concentrations as high as 400 /,cg/l,'M 1 BE was detected in the Rocky's ' <br /> Restaurant dornestrc water well sample at a concentration of 12 ag/l LAME and ETBE were <br /> detected in water samples collected from wells MWA and MW-2 at concentrations as high as 1 7 , <br /> ,ug/l Methanol was detected in a water sample collected from MW-6A at a concentration of 420 ' <br /> µg/1, ethanol was detected in water samples collected from wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-6'\ and MW- <br /> 6B at concentiatrons ranging as high as 50 µg/l, in the stornl drain grab water sample at a <br /> concentration of 86,000 ,ug/l and 3n the grab water sample from the Rocky's Restaurant Culligan <br /> bottled water system at a concentration of 28 Mcg/l No other fuel oxygenates were detected aboN e <br /> laboratory reporting limits Dissolved MTBE data collected on 28 March 2000 from the Flag City <br /> CheN r on site is contoured in Figui e 4 <br /> Analytical results of the round water samples are summarized in Tables 3 and 4 The labotator <br /> yt g } y <br /> reports (KIFF Analytical Report No 16356 and 16390) and chain-of-custody forms are presented <br /> in Appendix H 4 <br /> r 4 t <br /> At the request of AGE, KIFF Analytical rechecked the I ethanol ground water analysis from wells MEQ'-1, MW-2, MW-4, MW-5, MW-6A, MW-6B, MW-7 and SD-1 As a result KIFF Analytical <br /> L <br /> performed a second ethanol analysis of giouid water samples and indicated that the results of the <br />'R second analysis,fiorn wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-4, MW-5, 1\4W-6A and MW-7 did not detect any <br /> ethanol, ethanol was detected at well MW-613 ata concentration of 7 9 ,ug/l and from the stornn drain { - <br /> at a contend ation of 66,000µg/1 The second eth'anol analysis was performed 16 days after sample <br /> collection, or 2 days past the hold tine KIFF Analytical reported that it was not clear if the <br /> difference between the ongunal,ethanol analysis and the second ethanol analysis vas due to,the age <br /> of the grouind wdie"r samples The laboratory reports for the second ethanol analysis (KIFF <br /> I Analytical Report No 16356) and chain-of-'cu`stody forms are presented in Appendix 1 , `' F <br /> r � <br />' 60 INSTALLATION OF GROUND WATER EXTRACTION WELL � <br /> On 28 March 2000, gropnd water extraction well EW-1 ,vas installed'at the site, ground water <br /> ! i <br /> L <br /> 4dianeed GtuEmrranmenial Inc <br /> i <br /> , i <br />