Laserfiche WebLink
• 13 September 1999 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 96-0232 <br /> - Page 3 of 5 <br /> groundwater samples and MTBE in all seven samples, laboratory analysis of one domestic drinking <br /> ' water well sample detected MTBE , <br /> 3 1 RELATIVE GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> During the June 1999 monitoring event, depths to ground water in wells MWA, MW-2, MW-4, <br /> MW-5, MW-6A, MW-6B and MW-7 were measured to be between 10 03 and 11 25 feet below the _ <br /> top of well casings, ground water elevations were calculated to be between 1 51 and'] 81 feet below <br /> mean sea level Ground water elevation at the site decreased an average 3 51 feet between the <br /> February 1999 and June 1999 ground water monitoring events The ground water elevation data for <br /> z MW-I, MW-2, MW-4, MW-5. MW-6A and MW-7 during the June 1999 ground -wafer monitoring <br /> event is depicted in Figure 3 Due to the deep screened interval, data collected fi om MW-613 was not <br /> utilized to determine ground water elevations <br /> Ground water monitoring data collected in the area of wells MWA, MW-5 and MW-7 indicated a <br /> ground water flow direction generally toward the northwest at a gradient of 0 002 ft/ft, or <br /> approximately 11 feet per mile (Figure 3), ground water monitoring data collected in the area of <br /> wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-4 and MW-6 suggested a ground water flow direction 91;nerally toward <br /> the east-northeast at a gradient of 0 002 ft/ft Ground water was approximately 32 feet above the <br /> screened intervals in monitoring wells MW6-13 Therefore this well is "drowned and yields a <br /> sample representative of deeper screened ground water <br /> 3 2 LABORATORY RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> TPH-g was detected in the water sample collected from MW-1 during the June 1999 Sampling event <br /> at a concentration of 440 micrograms per liter (u.g/1), however the laboratory reported that the <br /> gasoline chromatogram for this sample did not have typical gasoline characteristics TPH-d was <br /> detected in a water sample collected from MW-2 at a concentration of 150 ,ug/l and in the deeper <br /> screened water from MW-6B at'a concentration of 110 Mcg/l The laboratory reported that the diesel <br /> chiomatograms for the MW-2 and MW-6B samples did not have typical diesel characteristics <br /> MTBE was detected in ground water samples collected from all seven ground water samples <br /> utilizing EPA Method 8020 at concentrations as high as 1,,600,ug/l, MTBE was confirmed in MW-1, <br /> MW-2, MW-4, MW-6A, MW-6B and MW-7 samples utilizing EPA Method 8260, no other fuel <br /> oxygenates were detected above Iaboratory reporting limits MTBE was detected in the domestic <br /> drinking water well sample (Rocky's Restaurant) utilizing EPA Method 8020 and confirmed <br /> utilizing EPA Method 8260 at concentrations as high as 11 pgll <br /> V � <br /> Advanced t.eor'nm rronmen[ai,inc <br /> f • i ) t ' <br />