Laserfiche WebLink
16'0'c tober 1`997' <br /> AGE-NC'Project No. 96-0232 ; <br /> Page 3 of 5 -. <br /> Unified Soil Classificatiori,System (USCS), and were monitoredfo'r the presence of organic.vapor <br />' .using an organic vapor meter equipped with a photo4onization detectoi(PID: Thermo'Enviroiimental <br /> :E <br /> ,580A; 10.0 eV; calibrated to isobutylene). Boring-logs are summarized in Appendix A. <br /> 2.6: EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION <br /> All hollow stem au ers-were steam cleaned-prior to'advancing each boring.'All sampling tools and <br /> g. <br /> kirass sleeves used for sample,collection were thoroughly rinsed with clean Water-.after washing with <br /> t' a solution of Alconox. All Geoprobe rods-were cleaned prior to advancement in each probing.' <br />'. 3:0. FINDINGS - - <br /> -SOIL PROFILE „ <br /> Soil encountered at the site'consisted primarily of silt, clayey silt,,fine'sandy,silt, and fine to coarse <br /> sand: The following lithology was`generally encountered beneath the site: A dark brown, damp, fine- <br /> sandy silt was encountered from surface grade.to.5 feet bsg. A'in led red=brown•to pale brown, <br /> damp, fine to medium satid was encountered,at depths between 5 and 15 feet bsg. Red-brown, moist . <br /> to saturated; clayey silt, fine sandy silt and silty sand intervals were'encountered at depths between <br /> 15 and�40 feet. A red-brown, saturated, fine to coarse sand was encountered at depths between 40 <br /> rand 52 feet bsg, while a brown,.dry silt was encountered at depths between 52 and 60 feet bsg. A ; <br /> brown, saturated,-silty fine-�sand was'encounteredbetween 60`and 65%feet, while fine to medium sand <br /> and silty fine sand were encountered at depths between b5 and 69 feet:,A brown; moist, clayey silt <br /> was encountered at-70 feei,bsg.,Boiing logs`ar'e included in Appendix A, General lithology beneath <br /> the site'in cross sectional view.is depicted on,Figure Nos 3. and 4'- Geological'Cross,Section A -A," <br /> and GeologicahD-oss Section B -B'. r <br /> TED SOIL, AND GROUND WATER' <br /> 12 FIELD�EVIDENCE,OF HYDROCARBON-IMPAC <br /> Petroleum hydrocarbon'odo'r•was not detected from any'sarnples collected from borings P-.1 through, <br /> - , <br /> P=S;-however, petroleum hydrocarbon vapor was detected from soil boring'P=1 at;concentrations as <br /> high as,45 parts per'millibn (ppin)', and'from P-2'.at concentrations up to 33 ppm: <br /> ' y' " Advanced GeoEnvironmenW,Inc. <br />