Laserfiche WebLink
N. <br /> --OW, <br /> TABLE 1 - CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED DATA <br /> FOR NO FURTHER ACTION REQUESTS AT UNDERGROUND TANK SITES <br /> Site Name and Location: Hotchkiss Mortuary, 5 W. Highland, Tracy,San Joaquin <br /> NA 1 1. Distance to production wells for municipal, domestic, agriculture, industry and <br /> other uses within 2000 feet of the site; <br /> NA 2. Site maps, to scale, of area impacted showing locations of former and existing tank systems, 550-gallon gasoline tank <br /> excavation contours and sample locations, boring and monitoring well elevation contours, removed 6/90 <br /> gradients, and nearby surface waters, buildings, streets, and subsurface utilities, <br /> NA 3. Figures depicting lithology(cross section), treatment system diagrams; <br /> y❑ 4. Stockpiled soil remaining on-site or off-site disposal(quantity); Unknown quantity disposed at unknown location <br /> FNAJ 5. Monitoring wells remaining on-site,fate; <br /> NA 6. Tabulated results of all groundwater elevations and depths to water, 7 ft bgs in San Joaquin Co. <br /> O7.Tabulated results of all sampling and analyses: All soil and groundwater samples were ND for TPH-g, TPH-d,and <br /> BTEX. Groundwater samples were ND for MTBE. <br /> F Detection limits for confirmation sampling <br /> ya Lead analyses <br /> Y 8. Concentration of contaminants found and those remaining in soil and Contaminated soil limited to the extent of <br /> groundwater, on-site: the excavation. Groundwater samples <br /> y Lateral and y Vertical extent of soil contamination were ND. ft <br /> Soil boring at 9 and 12- bgs was ND for <br /> 8y Lateral and y Vertical extent of groundwater contamination petroleum contaminants <br /> NA 9. Zone of influence calculated and assumptions used for subsurface <br /> remediation system and the zone of capture attained for the soil and <br /> groundwater remediation system; <br /> 0 10.Reports/information y❑Unauthorized Release Form 7/30/91 ❑N QMRs(Dates) <br /> N] Well and boring logs 0 PAR FRP a Other(report name) <br /> yO 11.Best Available Technology(BAT)used or an explanation for not using BAT,• Removed tank in 1990. <br /> 0 12.Reasons why background waslrs unattainable using BAT, No contamination found from soil boring at 9 and 12-ft <br /> bgs. <br /> NA 13.Mass balance calculation of substance treated versus that remaining; <br /> FNA <br /> NA 14.Assumptions,parameters, calculations and model used in risk <br /> assessments, and fate and transport modeling; <br /> 0 15.Rationale why conditions remaining at site will not adversely See comment 12 above. <br /> impact water quality, health, or other beneficial uses;and <br /> NA 16.WET or TCLP results <br /> By:n Comments:Originally contamination was detected beneath tank in 1990. However, soil samples, collected <br /> Il from a boring at 9 and 12-ft bgs were ND for petroleum contaminants. The groundwater sample collected <br /> Date: at 12-ft bgs, was ND for petroleum contaminants, also. <br />