Laserfiche WebLink
f 1 <br /> =�•.�—==so— _.L_ <br /> f <br /> 1 <br /> 1 <br /> Resources well records, no domestic or potable water supply wells are located within <br /> one mule of the Greyhound facility <br /> SITE INVESTIGATION <br /> Soil Boring and Soil Sampling Procedures <br /> rIn January 1993, a total of four soil borings were advanced at the locations shown <br /> i <br /> on Figure 2 (Borings B-3, B-4, B-5, and B-6) to characterize the lateral and vertical <br /> r` = extent of hydrocarbon contamination at,the site. Each of the borings was advanced to <br /> depths between 45 and 46 feet using 4 25-inch inside-diameter hollow-stem augers and <br /> split-spoon sampling techniques in accordance with ASTM-Standard D-1586 Prior to <br /> advancing each boring, all downhole equipment was decontaminated by steam-cleaning. <br /> All drill cuttings were containerized in labelled DOT-approved, 55-gallon drums and <br /> left on site for proper disposal by Greyhound at a later date based on analytical results. <br /> Soil samples were collected in brass sample tubes at five-feet intervals and were <br /> logged by an experienced ES geologist, visually inspected for signs of staining and <br /> u screened for the presence of hydrocarbon odors and the evolution of organic vapors <br /> r with a photoionization detector (PID) Based upon PID readings, one soil sample per <br /> boring was selected for chemical analyses and sent to a State of California, Department <br /> of Health Services (DHS)-certified hazardous waste laboratory to be analyzed for <br />'r BTEX by EPA Method 8020 and TPHD by the DHS/LUFT Method (modified EPA <br /> Method 8015). <br /> Soil sampling protocol consisted of capping each end of the brass tube with teflon <br /> tape and non-reactive, plastic end caps The caps were then sealed with clear tape A <br /> chain-of-custody record accompanied each soil sample from selection and preparation <br /> r of the appropriate container at the laboratory, to the sample collection site in the field <br /> and back to the laboratory. Each sample was individually labeled, recorded in the field <br /> notebook, immediately packed in ice, and sealed inside an insulated shipping container <br /> r and shipped by overnight couner to the laboratory. The remaining portion of the split- <br /> spoon sample was used to describe subsurface materials Boring logs are presented in <br /> Appendix A Based on data collected, two geologic cross-sections of the site <br /> r stratigraphy were prepared. Cross section locations are shown on Figure 3. The cross- <br /> sections are included as Figures 4a and 4b. <br /> Groundwater Elevation Measurements <br /> During the supplemental site assessment activities, ch well was monitored for <br /> depth to water sing an electric water level indicator. Ndne of the wells were found to <br /> contain free✓product or hydrocarbon ,,sheens. In addition, groundwater level <br /> rmeasurements were made on January 20, 1993. Results are provided in Table 1 / ' <br /> These data indicate the hydraulic gradient across the site was approximately 0.003 feet <br /> per foot to the south <br />' ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> Soil samples collected for this site assessment were analyzed for BTEX and TPHD. <br /> TPHD analysis was performed using the DHS/LUFT-approved method (modified EPA <br /> EIS/SX356 05/0005 <br />', 3 <br />